Conspiracy Social Change Social Engineering Technology Top News World

Study Suggests That Apple Deliberately Sabotages Old Products, “iPhone Slow” Peaks After Every New Release

Time and time again I’ve heard people complain about their iPhones or Mac laptops getting slower and slower, forcing them to purchase entirely new products. However, many people who have experienced this technological lull also noticed that the deterioration of their Apple products coincided with the launch of Apple’s new products.

To be honest, if Apple was doing this, it would be a pretty smart business move. They launch new products periodically, and all of them are really just slightly fancier versions of their older models. People don’t often need these products, they simply want them. They only become a “need” when their older models break or malfunction.

Personally, I love these products! But every 2-4 years, my iPhones all of a sudden malfunction and my MacBook will randomly get slower. The question is: Are these products simply malfunctioning thanks to “old age” and natural wear and tear, or are they breaking because Apple purposefully slows down its older models prior to releasing new ones?

Study Suggests That Apple Deliberately Sabotages Old Products

A study performed by student Laura Trucco at Harvard University aimed at determining whether or not there was any truth behind the claims that Apple sabotages its own products prior to releasing new models.

The study reviewed worldwide searches for “iPhone slow” and discovered that this particular phrase was searched for significantly more whenever a new iPhone was about to be launched. Trucco then compared those results to the findings of other searches for Apple’s competitors’ phones, such as “Samsung Galaxy slow,” and found that the phrase was not searched for more around the time that a new Samsung phone model was released.

As you can see, the number of Google searches for “iPhone slow” spiked every time a new phone model was launched and made available to the public:


You can then review the number of searches for “Samsung Galaxy slow” in comparison to the release dates for their new phone models:


This isn’t the first time anyone has publicly discussed these claims, suggesting that Apple does in fact sabotage its old products prior to releasing new ones. For example, Catherine Rampell of the New York Times suggested that Apple could design its new operating systems so that they only properly work on their newer devices.

Rampell even stated that her own iPhone 4 got slower when she downloaded the new operating system at the time, and that the only solution to fix it would be to purchase the newer version of the iPhone.

Rampell explained, “When major innovations remain out of reach, and degrading durability threatens to tick off loyal customers, companies like Apple can still take a cue from the fashion industry.”

Apple doesn’t necessarily need to make its products more advanced in regard to technology in the same way that many other tech companies need to. Apple can simply make slight technological advancements in addition to more appealing aesthetic changes and still convince customers that they need to buy their newest products, even if they operate extremely similarly.

Even if their older models are still functioning, they continue to perpetuate this consumer mindset that “we need to follow the latest trends,” similar to the fashion industry. It’s largely about aesthetics.


Final Thoughts 

It’s important to keep in mind that, although Apple could be purposefully slowing down older models in order to convince you to purchase their newer ones, this is not a hard fact. Smartphones and laptops naturally slow down over time, especially when you’re updating your software and apps constantly as well as filling them steadily with more digital debris.

So, although your phones may seem slower after updating them, this may not actually be proof of this “conspiracy theory.” Plus, if Apple is actually sabotaging their own products, is there anything really “wrong” with that? They’re a business, and ultimately their number one goal is to profit. By selling you more phones, they will obviously make more money, which is their end goal anyways. Sure, it may seem unethical to the consumer, but it’s not necessarily “wrong.”

Either way, there’s no way of knowing 100% whether or not Apple purposefully slows down its products prior to launching its new ones. However, if you do notice that your phone or laptop is slow and you need a new one, do not just throw them out. Either give them or sell them to someone who could actually use it, return it to Apple so they can reuse it for parts, or get it fixed so you don’t need to purchase an entirely new product.

These electronics are by no means “good for the environment,” there are parts that need to be mined for and they require a lot of energy to produce. When you can prevent having to purchase something new or save something from ending up in a landfill, do it.

Editor’s Note: While I can appreciate the author’s optimism, “planned obsolescence” is very real, and in many cases, verified. And there is indeed nothing legally wrong with sabotaging one’s own products in order to incentivize consumers to purchase new ones, yet this is next-level sinister in terms of good business practice. The important take away here is that your consumer power is a very important tool today that is given very little attention in terms of dictating the country’s direction, and for obvious reason. In fact, it is the only power left to the individual that actually garners a response from our leaders in their ivory towers, if not grudgingly and reluctantly, but a real-world response nonetheless. So as we enter into a time when such practices are becoming public knowledge, opt for a product or company that does not violate your privacy while simultaneously systematically weakening your now thousand dollar product, so as to be effectively downgraded and hindered just in time for their next product installment. Opt for a company that does not put the government’s needs and that of its shareholders, over the success of its very product, and those who mindless still choose to buy it. 

5 Replies to “Study Suggests That Apple Deliberately Sabotages Old Products, “iPhone Slow” Peaks After Every New Release

  1. Plus, if Apple is actually sabotaging their own products, is there anything really “wrong” with that? They’re a business, and ultimately their number one goal is to profit. Seriously? you actually wrote those words? Its people like you why disgusting companies like Apple get away with this. It is clear as day what Apple are doing, this is not a coincidence and everyone knows Apple release an update just after/before the new model comes out to purposely slow the old phone down. This doesn’t happen to any other handset only Apple products. I’ve had my Galaxy S4 now for 5-6 years and it runs faster than a later iPhone that has been updated. The fact you are defending Apple here and saying, well…it doesnt matter anyway is why they can get away with doing this to their braindead loyal customers.

    1. rofl fuck you, jimmy. you’re a moron. Of fucking course its wrong. Products used to be built to last, not built to steal your money. You’re a fucking fool.

      And it is a hard fact, there’s a study that proves it, not suggests it. Do your homework better, terrible blog writer.

  2. I agree with Jimmy above, and the editor, I will never buy an Apple product for me or any member of my family…in fact I will ridicule anyone I know who does…everything about Apple is sinister and satanic…they run their company like the CIA, even worse

    1. and, I know from experience as I am the breakfix IT industry and every Apple product I work on I HAVE to charge more because the parts are way more expensive and proprietary, but also they take way more time and care not to damage in the process….just see what’s involved in replacing a keyboard in a MacBook…you have to tear the whole thing down and remove over 100 tiny screws!!!

  3. “To be honest, if Apple was doing this, it would be a pretty smart business move.”
    It would actually be criminal and considering the numbers of victims and amount of money involved. I wouldn’t rule out the death penalty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.