The Daily Wrap Up
Biometrics Biowarfare Conspiracy Daily Wrap Up Economy Government Health Podcast Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Science Social Engineering Top News World

DoD Caught Inflating Old Numbers To Hide Pandemic Of Injected & US Gov’s Alarming New PSYWAR Video

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (5/18/22).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.



Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)

DoD Inflates Numbers
Pandemic Of The Injected 
Pandemic Treaty
Digital ID/The Great Reset
Money Game Video

Important TLAV Mask Coverage

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

9 Replies to “DoD Caught Inflating Old Numbers To Hide Pandemic Of Injected & US Gov’s Alarming New PSYWAR Video

  1. O/T-Trump crashed the stock market! (sarc)
    I found the video with the pedo Aquino to be laughable.
    Lavey’s carney barker Satanism isn’t scary. (Caps because he is real)
    Narrative control and credibility were used up in the COV-LARP and won’t be coming back.
    The comrades never listen to their favorite republican Abe Lincoln about not being able to fool all of the people.

  2. Hello Ryan

    Just to say I don’t comment often but do watch and read most things posted on tlav.

    Anyway, I was interested in the whole autoimmune and jab discussion. As I’ve mentioned before I have autoimmune arthritis, and wouldn’t touch the covid jabs with a fifty foot pole frankly. There was clearly no data on the effect of giving these jabs to people with autoimmune conditions, many of whom are already on seriously toxic medications. Anyway, I belong to a arthritis web community/help called NRAS. It’s a support group folks can join to get info and advice from folks with rheumatic conditions. It is a monitored site, and there is some useful information. Although very medication based. I have been reprimanded in the past for suggesting alternative therapies. It can be a bit cliquey, so I don’t use it much. That said, since the roll out of vaccines I have kept a firm eye on the welfare of people on the site. Many of whom have been recommended to get five jabs! I got attacked recently for suggesting to a poor woman that maybe getting a fifth jab was pointless given she had admitted to a poor immune response to the previous four. There was a bit of a pile on ( you know how it goes!) and I was reported for giving misinformation. Some of these people have been so terrorised into believing that they will die from covid. The sad fact is that scrolling through the site I can see not only were nearly all the triple jabbed and boosted hit by covid despite jabs, a great many had severe reactions and horrendous flair ups of original disease. Meds that had previously put people in remission no longer worked, and many ended up on steroids etc. Interestingly I was not sanctioned by NRAS. They admitted that I had not done anything outside the rules. It’s interesting to note that after my questioning the effectiveness of jabs, and mentioning adverse events, NRAS have recently put up a questionnaire asking for people’s reactions to covid jabs. This is supposedly from rheumatologists interested in results. I did do the questionnaire as a non jabbed person. It asks about mental health, current health condition and reason behind not taking jab etc etc. Obviously I didn’t see the jabbed version. From responses so far it looks like it’s more difficult to fill out form as jabbed individual. Many not finishing the form as questionnaire makes no mention of fifth jab. Most GPs are not even aware of a fourth and fifth jab. Lots of complaints about the lack of clarity and support on this.

    Many immunocompromised (myself included) were given letters telling us we can have antivirals should we test positive for covid. I personally wouldn’t touch these either. It appears to be the newer variety of antivirals being tested out on people. Interestingly GPs seem to be unaware of this too. Many frightened people who tested positive and wanted antivirals have been given the run around.

    It’s horrific to me that these people have been so terrified into believing they are extremely clinically vulnerable to a virus most would have fought of naturally anyway, and for the most part been better off if they’d done so. Those on immunosuppressents have always known to be a bit careful. Drs simply told us all to avoid dodgy food and wash hands! Most folks simply just got on with living to the best of their capabilities. Now we have compromised people not only terrified to live, but many have had conditions made much worse, but will still take a fifth vaccine if offered! It’s beyond cruel in my opinion.

    I am angry on their behalf, and increasingly frustrated at their inability to put two and two together. That said, it’s not unusual for people on this site to say how wonderful a particular medicine is whilst suffering severe side effects! A fear response I think, and a desire to believe that meds will just fix the pain. The pain is grim, so I understand. I guess the same can be said of covid. Scare people enough and they’ll take anything! I’m glad I didn’t.

  3. From where I can find the intro video for this?
    The “Vaccines work” collage…

    Thanks for great content!

  4. Hi Ryan, long time listener, first time replyer.

    This former editor of the New England Jounal resigned after witnessing many manipulations.

    28th June 2021
    Several years ago, I wrote a book called Doctoring Data. It was my attempt to help people navigate their way through medical headlines and medical data.
    One of the main reasons I was stimulated to write it, is because I had become deeply concerned that science, especially medical science, had been almost fully taken over by commercial interests. With the end result that much of the data we were getting bombarded with was enormously biased, and thus corrupted. I wanted to show how some of this bias gets built in.
    I was not alone in my concerns. As far back as 2005, John Ioannidis wrote the very highly cited paper ‘Why most Published Research Findings are False’. It has been downloaded and read by many, many, thousands of researchers over the years, so they can’t say they don’t know:
    ‘Moreover for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias.’1
    Marcia Angell, who edited the New England Journal of Medicine for twenty years, wrote the following. It is a quote I have used many times, in many different talks:
    ‘It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.’

    Also, the blatant hijacking of the Cures Act by BigPharma.

    at the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) reports that at least 39 of 42 patient advocacy groups who participated in discussions with the FDA over agency review processes for prescription drugs received funding from pharmaceutical companies. And at least 15 have representatives of drug or biotechnology companies on their governing boards.
    The study is particularly notable now because Congress is poised to pass the 21st Century Cures Act, which trades temporary additional funding for the National Institutes of Health and the FDA for permanent weakening of the FDA’s approval process. Over 1,400 lobbyists have been working on this bill, which would be a major financial boon to the drug and medical device industries.
    Patient advocacy groups have factored heavily into the lobbying effort. According to an analysis from research group Avalere in December 2014, 43 percent of public comments on the House version of the bill were from patient advocacy groups.
    But those groups are not necessarily independent, POGO warns.
    For instance, the National Health Council, a group that calls itself “The United Patient Voice” and has advocated before the FDA for faster drug approvals, includes on its board of directors leaders of the two main trade groups for the drug industry — Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), and Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) – along with executives from drug companies Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, and Alkermes. PhRMA gave the National Health Council $1.2 million in 2014; in all, 77 percent of its funding came from the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, according to POGO. Its “Policy Action Team” also has a PhMRA representative on it, along with an employee of Johnson & Johnson.
    Pfizer, the drug company giant, even listed the National Health Council as a “Trade Association Membership” on its lobbying forms.
    Another group, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, received at least $1 million in funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Novartis, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, and Takeda Oncology. Joseph Kelley, a vice president of government affairs (which typically means lead lobbyist) for Eli Lilly, sits on the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society board, along with Bristol-Myers Squibb executive Renzo Canetta, and Dana Callow of PAREXEL, a liaison to drug companies on clinical trials. … other include FasterCures, a division of the Milken Institute, hosted a recent conference about finding cures that received funding from nearly a dozen drug companies.

    I have a lot more to share and am currently working on an email to send to you regarding 2004 ProjectBioShield, Milken Institutes role, the World Jewish Congress’s hijacking of our government and health department, the Balfour Declaration and RonaldLauder’s involvement with the “wider” Zionist Movement.

      1. No worries, while I’d love to have all the videos downloaded, I don’t have near enough space for that 😉

  5. This video gave me nightmares. Wtf. To me it says the guns are on us. Everyone us a domestic terrorist now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.