The Daily Wrap Up
Conspiracy Daily Wrap Up Government Health Podcast Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Science Social Engineering Top News

In UK You Have 2X Risk Of “Getting COVID” If You Have Been Jabbed & More Likely To Die In Scotland

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (1/19/22).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.


Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)

Narrative Walkback
Indoctrination Of Children 
Natural Immunity
Pandemic Of The Injected 

Important TLAV Mask Coverage

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

14 Replies to “In UK You Have 2X Risk Of “Getting COVID” If You Have Been Jabbed & More Likely To Die In Scotland

    1. More people valued their lives over money than they expected? To let any building momentum against the governments’ narrative calm down? Just part of the push and pull tactic used in abusive relationships to prevent the abused from leaving the relationship?

  1. Ryan

    I am going to “double down” myself now on the theory I have previously espoused here.

    It appears “they” have decided, based on their own data analysis, that their technology is too flawed to allow the current strategy to go forward. I hypothesize that their own “risk-benefit” analysis went into the red and they didn’t see much hope of turning that around before they encountered more backlash than they are comfortable with at this point. Some fat pasty feet got cold.

    So whoever and wherever they are, the little group of actual shot callers have made the decision to pull the plug. At least for now.

    If my thesis is correct, then some of their most enthusiastic front line tyrants will be left exposed to that same backlash. They will find out just how disposable they really are. They had been led to believe they would NEVER be held accountable, but of course that all had to ride on this being a success. But to the parasites actually behind all this, people never mattered throughout history and they don’t matter now. Its all just “business” to them.

    I can’t WAIT to see what happens to those Australian dictators now when they realize Australia really is just a big island and they are now stuck on it with the people they tried to ruin and imprison.

    And I can’t wait to hear you start diving into all this.

    Take care brother

  2. An additional piece of information which reinforces your points in regards to the NSW Health data is that our vaccination push didn’t really ramp up until the second half of 2021. On June the 16th, which is a significant date point for much of the data you quoted, only 3.73% of the population aged over 12 had received two doses of the available injections. By November the 25th, another date of significance in the weekly reports, that figure had reached 91.27% and today sits at 92.98%. The corresponding case numbers:

    June 16, 3.73% double dosed – 3 cases for that day bringing the cumulative total to 5,626

    November 25, 91.27% double dosed – 276 cases for that day bringing the cumulative total to 80,681

    January 20, 92.98% double dosed – 30,825 cases for the day bringing the cumulative total to 895,004

    The increase by orders of magnitude means it’s working!

  3. Maybe tou covered this, but if not this study discussed in GatewayPundit is apparently not yet peer reviewed but very interesting:

    And check out the little psychopathic rat Fauci at guess where? World Economic Forum, Davos, complaining about “misinformation” in the US:

  4. The UK government are in the middle of a scandal right now, when it was revealed that while these criminals were ordered the rest of the country to not have parties over Christmas, and were stopping people from meeting ill relatives, they were at the same time having their own parties, and there are photos of Johnson and other Tories at these parties. Johnson’s is hanging on to his job by a thread, so to distract from that and in attempt to win back some favour from the UK public, Johnson has suddenly decided to roll back all the covid restrictions.

    1. Aren’t the parties from a year ago rather than a few weeks ago? And considering how much effort the state media and social media put into protecting the public’s perception of these criminals on television, it all seems staged to get the brainwashed to call for more authoritarianism and to distract those who are aware or are becoming so to the rebellion of the healthcare workers, the health status of those hospitalised, the dropping of comparative data collection, etc. The historically rubbish modeler from the government’s Scientific A-holes Group for Emergencies (I forgot what the ‘A’ stood for), Neil Ferguson cheated on his wife and went to see his mistress during the first prison lockdown. Dominic Cummings sent his children to stay with their grandparents while everyone else’s children were made to feel like “granny-killers” for simply breathing. The Carehome Killer and former Health Secretary Matthew Midazolam Hancock cheated on his wife with a colleague during their work hours. A huge bunch of criminals and puppets along with their servants and security physically travelled to Scotland for the climate. Rich people in the football industry didn’t need to self-isolate because they’re economically valuable according to the government. Airlines still running. But bloody parties are the big no-no for people/media? And this is just a few of the stories from only England. Even for those with no understanding nor interest in science, but only have basic common sense to save them, SOME THING should have raised eyebrows more than a year ago. Then again, people don’t even question the flat, white and seemingly unmoving sheets and trails of bright white plane-poop that start midair we’re supposed accept as natural clouds as well as the pastel-toned sky colours so I’m not surprised by their stupidity regarding matters on the ground either. Bottom line, I think it’s a distraction. People who are aware of the global circus show should cheer on the parties and ask the brainwashed “if the “scientists” and people working most closely to them as well as the economically valuable aren’t in a bunker fearing for their lives, why are you, who just receives the dumbed down version of their information?”

  5. Jim @ 10:24 is, as you know, is following a script, one of the deceptive narratives. These scientists claiming that what they are “looking at” is something manipulated in a lab, is nonsense to me. What are they “looking at”? Computer generated guess work, created in their labs!?

    Nope, not buying that this sars-cov-2 even exists in nature, nor in labs. If it did, if there were an actual new deadly virus let loose, all the lying and deception, hiding of information, censoring of truth tellers, all the fraudulent science propaganda………WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY

    1. Why sars-CoV-2? Was this ever isolated/purified and sequenced? Not likely. So where is their proof of its’ biological existence, and proof of it being a contagion?
      I think sars-CoV-2 was patented without any real proof of its’ existence. They claim this patented alleged theoretical virus is in the wild, because it is patented. “They” get to profit from owing it, whether real or not. Correct?

  6. Hello Ryan, thanks for this important information. The sequencing stopping all over the world almost simultaneously to bring us “the omicron” is so obtuse, as most of their meddling is far from subtle or complicated.

    I need to make a few remarks in regard to the last daily wrap-up and others before. When it comes to “theories about technical stuff”, you should get a second opinion from a “techno-savvy” person; preferably one that laughs at the wrong times during science fiction movies, because they got their physics backwards again.
    Catherine Austin Fitts does a good analysis when it comes to finances, but her journeying into “spraying nanobots” and whatnot towards the end of her talks unfortunately degrades what she is previously stating.

    The ajduvances are made to alarm the body’s defenses. However, they are non-functional garbage that, by definition, is there to be broken down by the body. They have been experimenting with those, obviously. Even more evidently, those “experiments” (adulterated injections) are highly illegal.

    The technology is not nearly as far as you think it is. Nobody’s racing towards “a master AI”, as the way we do AI currently cannot go anywhere near real intelligence. It falls fundamentally short, by principle. You won’t be seeing “self-replicating nanobots” any time soon, either.
    When watching those presentations of new technology you have to keep in mind that they are begging for money, presenting their products as shiny as possible – and typically cheating to do so. I don’t know if you can recall the “laser defense” that was supposed to shoot down missiles from the Reagan era (over 4 billions in taxes blown). There is a documentation about that, showing how they cheated to make it seem like they could shoot down missiles with lasers. In the end, they did not manage to beat physics. (The hollow cylinders were stretched inside with ropes until just before collapse. A fly would have been enough to collapse the cylinder.)

    There is one argument that should convince you: Technology can be analyzed.
    Current processors for our computers come with billions of transistors. They even implement “fake logic” to throw off competitors analyzing their technology. This is “security by obscurity” and the amount of transistors makes it clear that this is not so easy to break down.
    Now imagine a “nanobot”. Yes, when it comes to the amount of transistors, you can stick a C64 into a pinhead. And then? Even a student could analyze it. There are known – semi-automated – methods for doing so (slicing, etc.). This would be a piece of cake. Then anybody would be able to replicate that thing, modify it and use it against them. They would never risk this. If “COVID-19” should have taught you one thing, then that we have all the smart guys. They cannot have many of those or else they “do the Snowden” and the whole thing backfires.
    Also, you need antennas for transmitting or capturing energy. The smaller the antenna, the higher the frequency. The higher the frequency, the higher the absorption. This is why RFID-chips are implanted directly under the skin …

    Their technology is mostly passive. It’s aimed at rendering us identifiable. They are few, we are many. They need to know their enemies, and they want to be able to spot them quickly.
    Smart phones have back doors. They can be turned into bugs easily. When recording, be it audio or video, they consume a lot of energy, though. Watch them coming up with “intelligent” phones listening in or watching out for signals, while consuming little power. This is what they are moving towards. “Siri, screw me. Siri look, I’m waving my hand – wake up!”. 😉

    That’s why I am not afraid of “robo-dogs”. If they send those against us, they know that we will send them back at them. They don’t have the brains. All their technology is faulty. Just look at the most recent “high-tech” military endeavors. They are all failures. When it gets complicated, they fall flat on their bellies.

    Their “COVID attack” was rushed. While they wanted to kill some sick and old, they surely did not want to hit “predominately obedient followers”, thus turning them. This is a colossal self-goal.

    What you should be afraid of is them tampering with DNA. Their DNA based “vaccines” can already become self-replicating, if the wrong mutation occurs. That stuff can NEVER be undone, once in the wild. This is all shear madness that is much more threatening than their “technology”.
    The things that they will be able to do, if we allow them to go on with “RNA based interventions” comes straight out of a horror cabinet. They can target specific ethnicities, single persons and even entire family lines…

    1. What an excellent and well reasoned comment. I diverge slightly from your viewpoint as regards “the smart guys” only because I have personally known some few extremely gifted people who were completely amoral and I don’t doubt that there are many such aberrant individuals happy to work towards the subjugation of their fellows. Nevertheless, I do agree that such people are rare and that most of what is being touted on the technology front, particularly regarding AI, nanobots etc. is largely flummery and wishes. Your concerns regarding DNA tampering I concur with completely.

  7. The two party paradigm is most assuredly Manichean in its simplicity. But riddle me this: Is it always no matter what, the correct thing to do to sit on the fence? Is there ever a situation {*cough* Palestine} where choosing a side is the right thing to do? And if it is possible in one instance {apartheid}, is it not possible in another {socialism vs. capitalism}? The Two Part Illusion applies firmly to the Republican vs. Democrat (or Liberal vs. Conservative) dichotomy, not so much when it comes to (third party) socialist parties vs. establishment capitalist parties. Socialism as an experiment deserves to be attempted free from the influence and intrusion of capitalists who directly benefit from sabotaging alternative ideologies. You unfairly simplify this issue when you declare anything to do with “left” or “right” is completely baseless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.