Interview
Censorship Conspiracy Government Health Interviews Podcast Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Social Engineering Technology Top News Whitney Webb

Whitney Webb Interview – Facebook “Whistleblower”, Ending Anonymity & Moderna’s Hail Mary

Joining me today is Whitney Webb, here to discuss her recent article on Moderna, as well as our previous discussion around your anonymity and privacy, and how these concepts are on the way out in lieu of a “reimagining” of our world where these concepts are a burden on the system; a system in which “you own nothing and you have never been happier” – or so we are aggressively told – known as The Great Reset. 

(https://www.rokfin.com/TLAVagabond)
(https://odysee.com/@TLAVagabond:5)
(https://www.bitchute.com/channel/24yVcta8zEjY/)

Source Links:

 

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:
www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bitcoin-donation
(3FSozj9gQ1UniHvEiRmkPnXzHSVMc68U9f)

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/category/ryan-cristian/

6 Replies to “Whitney Webb Interview – Facebook “Whistleblower”, Ending Anonymity & Moderna’s Hail Mary

  1. Just a tough, we actually never hear about china being devastated by the lockdowns from foreign countries.
    China might get in a position where the lockdowns must end cos they get the money from us. The lockdown works against hem at long term so they might become real kinetic threat if too much Chinese people die and it become unbarable…
    Someone pointed out that if there was 50 large cargo waiting near L.A. there s more then 200 in the port of China. People of China are having a bad time too.
    China did buy alot of food before this crisis, but long term their people will die from hunger or go to war.

    Make out anything you want about this

  2. Thanks for another informative discussion.

    Re: Blockchain “Crypto” Currencies (e.g., Bitcoin, et al.):

    Blockchain transaction processing (hashing) and recording (ledger) are inherently anonymous (and decentralized); what is not anonymous is the user’s device/IP and/or any ancillary service registration(s) they may have done…

    “Anonymous” (“Crypto”) — is this or that tech. ‘anonymous’ or not(?) — is a RED HERRING; because: No one can ever be sure if a tech. they use is truly ‘anonymous’, so, if that becomes the issue the masses will always be in-doubt (no certainty) and thus will not act/engage on the issue of Blockchain development/deployment; alas, the masses will just let it unfold in the hands of elites, banks, etc., which will certainly be in the interests of wealth and power not to empower the masses (as money should do).

    BLOCKCHAIN is ‘good’ (see: ‘disintermediation’, e.g.) — a step toward dismantling the FIRE ECONOMY* — what’s not good is it will be usurped and re-directed (i.e., centralized, etc.) to dis-empower the masses and further ‘stoke the FIRE’ as well as eliminate CASH (i.e., another bite out of Freedom).

    * FIRE Economy, see: https://michael-hudson.com/2013/09/f-is-for-fire-sector/

    One way I think of INTERNET TECH is the way I consider the concept of the Second Amendment — “A well regulated [Internet], being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear [Smartphones & Social Networking Apps], shall not be infringed.” — and just as with “arms”, the greater force/power is/was/will be with the State, not the people. The fundamental tech. is there for all to use (i.e., guns, the internet, smartphones) but the State will never let the tech. give more power to the masses that it has for itself. Furthermore, the State will use the tech. to oppress/suppress, control, dominate — that’s why the State (et al.) develops it in the first place — so the State will seek to prevent such ‘tech. power’ from flipping (which, in a Constitutional Republic such as the US, it should). Oh well.

    Facebook Freedom (an oxymoron, but, anyway…)
    In one sense, complaining about loss of ‘Internet Freedom’ is like demanding more oppression; we’re so far down the tech. tyranny road people have actually forgotten — or never knew — ‘psychological sovereignty’ (mental/emotional freedom), conversation (face-to-face or phone), writing letters (with care and sincerity, etc.), how to study/learn, etc..
    Human Consciousness and Community is being ruined by smartphones and social media/networking.
    If you want ‘Internet Freedom’ get off the “internet” (i.e., socializing, shopping, playing, masturbating, etc.).
    I, for one, have NEVER used Social Media, and I do not express myself with my thumbs, or where length/depth is proscribed.
    THE INTERNET IS AN EMPOWERING TOOL PRESENTED AS ‘BREAD & CIRCUSES’; THE STATE (et al.) GETS POWER WHILE THE MASSES GET PLAY & PLAYED.
    I’ve lamented all along the direction society chose to go with Internet Engagement: The first successful/profitable internet business model was Porn, for example. I had an office in SF c. early 90’s, two floors above a porn co. (they digitized porn mag pics and posted them on a subscription site). When a Credit Card Terminal Rep came to set-up a terminal in my office he told me the people on the second floor did “$10k+ per week in their CC transactions”. That’s when I knew the internet was going to go the wrong way (i.e., placating and gratifying instead of empowering); “With every technological advance a precious drop of Humanity is lost.”
    –N. Negroponte ( https://web.media.mit.edu/~nicholas/ )

    The Elizabeth Holmes (Theranos CEO … puppet) is a case-study of how the elites, via the deep-state, cultivate personalities to mass-market their products of power as ‘good for you’ (e.g., Gates, Zuck, Musk, etc.).
    Watch: “Theranos Scandal: The Real Story”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qk0_Y_FZN2k
    Read: https://thenakedhedgie.com/2021/10/02/the-theranos-scandal-the-real-story-1-3/
    See also: https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2021/08/en-larry-romanoff-todays-jewish.html

    PS

    I’ll be careful here:
    Whitney seems to be losing her humility — perhaps patience — which is understandable; but, unfortunate … and avoidable.
    For one, mocking people’s ignorance doesn’t help (them or you). I do it all the time (that’s why I understand you doing it); but, I’m not trying to make a living from people reading/watching me. Also, I try to recognize when/why I do it and find it’s usually unfair of me (there’s so much I don’t know and I would be offended if someone mocked me because they happen to posses some knowledge I haven’t yet acquired).
    Otherwise, Whitney, keep up the good work and don’t let the haters — Useful Idiots of the Status Quo — get you down … seriously.

    PS, Whitney

    Maybe this will pique your interest for further research/writing:
    https://aim4truth.org/2018/04/17/exposed-all-the-queens-agents-and-corporations-that-control-the-world/

  3. You and Whitney don’t realize that you are the video ‘game’. In your studios you are ‘real People’ however on our displays you are video characters and Real life is to turn off the computer and go outside ie self create moment to moment … draw, play the piano, visit neighbors and gather with friends, etc, etc … There is very little happening in the world today that could happen without the internet … and that would be a good thing…. ‘Life” could get real again.

  4. Hey Ryan-
    I noticed, based on the comment /hash/numbers in the URLs there seem to have been submitted 55 comments in the c. 12 hours between my first comment and my follow-up.
    First (c. 7pm): https:// …. /#comment-136094
    Follow-up (c. 6:30am): https:// … /#comment-136149

    Are those all rejected comments or are they in other threads?
    I’d like to read any/all TLAV comments.
    Or, If they are all rejected, I’m very curious as to why.
    Or, FYI, you’re missing comments (I know I used to submit mine using my proton email and they appeared to go through — got a comment # URL — but they never posted. I assumed they were rejected, now I’m wondering … who knows what).
    Or, let me know how I’m mistaken.

    Thanks, and best regards.

    PS
    I never check the g mail (truly, never) you have for me; but, once a month the proton version

  5. Regardless of safety or adverse injury death counts, investors in bogus ‘vaccines’ require the $returns / public image to be sound. Otherwise, they will flee and take their cash to somewhere better managed and less toxic, like bombing Palestinians.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *