The Daily Wrap Up
Biowarfare Business Conspiracy Daily Wrap Up Government Health Podcast Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Science Social Engineering Top News

Pfizer Says Jab Not Meeting Safety Profile, Illegal EUA, LNP “Not For Human Use” & Omicron Origins

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (1/10/22).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.


Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)

Common Cold
Pandemic Of The Injected 
Pfizer’s Genetic Therapy 

Important TLAV Mask Coverage

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

34 Replies to “Pfizer Says Jab Not Meeting Safety Profile, Illegal EUA, LNP “Not For Human Use” & Omicron Origins

  1. Hi TLAV I was compiling a list of global coverups and conspiracies, and was wondering if anyone had specific global coverups or conspiracies: I’ve noted some of the main ones like WMDs, 9/11, and Russiagate, but was wondering how many more I’m missing.

    1. How about climate change and cap ‘n’ trade, MK Ultra, CIA drug trafficking, Operation Northwoods, the peak oil myth, Unit 731, operation Paperclip, operation Mockingbird, the Federal Reserve act of 1913, the Kennedy assassinations, wall streets financing of Hitler, the Iraq war, the Afganistan war, the Syrian war etc.. Basically all wars since WWI, the trilateral commission, the council on foreign relations, the COVID plandemic.

  2. Theyre counting the fully vaxxed in the one shot catagory. Slight of hand. Look at the %.
    Its not pissible to have over 150% partially or fully vaxxed

      1. Hey, on the Lipid Nano-Particles thing where they are selling them to the phamraceutical companies to use in vaccines, but claiming they are not for use in humans. You said that didn’t make any sense to you and you would be correct, ….. but it made me think of an analogy. Head shop paraphernalia sales of 1/8th inch threaded tubing and elbows in a seemingly random order and quantity, in a bag of pieces. “No, we are not selling and Do Not sell Marijuana pipes”. lol It is a weak disclaimer that some lawyers believe will work to keep them from taking responsibility or being held accountable

  3. When breaking down the hospitalizations on the uodated govt site that they were listing old info on before, you have 59.7% unvaxxed and 50.3 vaxxed…
    I think you meant 49.7% for unvaxxed otherwise youre math os coming to a total of 110%.
    So you were right, the vaxxed is higher and you accidentally wrote 59.7 instead of 49.7 for unvaxxed

  4. Forgive me for me inexperience, but how exactly is the Digital ID and vaccine passport different than what the NSA can already do to its citizens. It obviously has to do with the digital currency, but is there any links I can look at to learn more.

    1. Digital ID could track you and any transaction you make in real time. It’s a mix of government and private sector info. Used along with a social media score or similar, could easily be used in real time to control, punish, isolate, coerce people based on their opinions, affiliations…

  5. Ryan

    Why would they need a “physical” or “geographical” location for the “origin” of a “virus” and or its “variants” that have all, every single one, been created as sumulations on a computer. Did they capture the virus from one of the “diplomats” in Botswana and overnight it to a lab where it was isolated, grown, and dubbed “Omicron?”

    No. No. No. No. Its all completely made up BS just like the “original.” May as well be a computer game.

    So the whole Botswana garbage is just there for the sake of the narrative.

    And by the way, every time they identify a new “variant” of “COVID-19” the allegedly newly mutated “virus” is assumed to be, by definition, a VARIATION on the prior strain of that same virus, agree?

    So to come out with some garbage about “Omicron” coming from a mouse….well then, it is NOT a “variant” of the original strain that allegedly infected humans in 2019, is it? Of course not. So that absurd spin means Omicron is a different version that did not evolve in humans at all. Right? They try to drive us insane. How about we don’t let them.

  6. Ryan, just a comment on the Scottish meddling with data. This is likely to originate with middle class, white NHS directors living in well appointed houses in Edinburgh, speaking with English accents. Why do I say ‘white’? Because the Black, Asian, Minority & Ethnic (BAME) representation within the NHS at the top level is extremely minimal. So much so that the 250 or so top directors are referred to as the ‘Snowy White Peaks’. Also, posh people living in Scotland tend to speak English, “with a plum in their mouths”.

  7. Hey Ryan! Halfway through this last show (1h 8m, roughly) you are referencing Ontario one dose vs. Fully vaxed. I am not certain about other Ontarians but some of my family members got jabbed early on w Johnson shot. I think it was just a “single course” injection so that may be why there are so many “one dose” folks. Great show this far as usual! Much love

  8. Dear Ryan,
    please restrain from using the word “antibodies” in conjunction with the terms “immunity” or “longterm immunity”. It is misleading.
    One of their most used weapons is their Orwellian Doublespeak and contorted speech. Whether it’s “pandemic”, “vaccine” or “antibodies and immunity” – they twisted the meanings of those words to fill their needs.
    Antibodies are not that important when it comes to viruses. It’s the “T cells” that provide long-lasting and sterile immunity. This can easily be verified, as there exist people who cannot create antibodies. Yet, those people can beat off COVID-19 and be immune afterwards.
    When a virus enters a cell, the cell then produces that virus. In this process, the “production waste” is being attached to the outside of the cell. T cells recognize patterns of that waste. If they deem the cell harmful, they destroy it. If the T cells recognize the disease, one can neither get sick nor spread that virus – sterile immunity.
    As their fake “vaccines” CANNOT CREATE T CELL IMMUNITY BY PRINCIPLE (cells never get infected with anything that looks like the real virus), they started (ab)using the word “antibodies” in conjunction with immunity. They do not provide immunity, though.

    You could talk to Sucharit Bhakdi about this. He is the expert when it comes to our immune system.

  9. I will never understand how someone as intelligent and brave as Abby Martin fell for this. Her reporting on Israel is balls to the walls brave and her ability to parse out the lies has been stalwart. I just don’t get it. I never will.

    I hope you get better, Abby. Youre one of the best out there.

  10. I was struck by your opening about showing some compassion for Abby. I think this is an important point to make. Most people thought they were doing the right thing for themselves, and others by accepting the jabs. Others were just scared. This hit home for me yesterday when I had an appointment at the rheumatology department of local hospital. The clinic was filled with young and old. Some with walking frames and sticks, others in wheel chairs, some with obvious joint and muscle damage, some thin, some fat, a variety of colours, cultures, religious, educational and economic backgrounds. Some looking like nothing ailed them at all…the paradox of the unseen disabilty. I know how that feels. One thing is for sure, people do not visit the rheumatology department for fun. Most will have waited months for a referral. Many will have been in agony whilst they waited. Most (myself included) would have taken crack if prescribed, if told it would stop the pain. The expectation is that the doctor can be trusted. He or she will figure out what is wrong, show compassion, and that medicines will cure the problem. We have been primed to believe in the medical model. A frightened patient suffering extreme pain will take the medicine without much questioning. It’s a matter of trust and belief. Most doctors are taught to prescribe medicines whilst often not learning about the side effects. Some of us learn quite quickly, through bad experiences that medicines are not all they are cracked up to be. We also learn quite quickly that doctors are just people, and like all people come with a set of prejudices, personality traits and life experiences. The good, great, bad and the arrogant and dangerous. Most are good, or a mixture of anything in-between. Learning this as a patient (often the hard way!) is valuable because it enables critical thinking around ones own health. Independent thought and research encourages self belief, resilience, and a feeling of not being done to. Other people may become so frightened by their condition that they become dependent upon their doctors. Often accepting poor treatment from specialists, and may even continue to take dangerous, or ineffective medicines despite experiencing significant harm. We have seen this with the jabs. It happens all the time with medicine. People in enough pain (physical or mental) or plainly terrified for themselves or loved ones will follow instructions from an individual in a position of power, even if they’re a gaslighting tyrant. Safety in numbers.

  11. Talking about the hospitalisations I have researched the numbers her in Québec and I have two points to add:. When put against the whole Health care system of the province, the “stated” overburden caused by the unvaccinated is a ridiculous percentage. If incidental COVID-19 is taken into account, the number is even more ridiculous. Another point is the age of people hospitalised. 3/4 are above 60 years old. It gives credence to Denis Rancourt’s point that the unvaccinated we see in hospitals are population too frail (comorbidities) to be vaccinated and are also most prone to be hospitalised. Adding to that the disppearance of the flu which took 2% to 6% of visits to the emergency pre-covid, the burden of the willingly unvaccinated is inexistant. Here’s a link in french:

  12. They are talking about this now because like what you and Clint were talking about, the limited hangout is in effect. They have reached a max holding point for the lies and they have to burn enough to save the most important drivers of this op.

  13. Hey Ryan have you read this?
    COVID-19 Deaths: Underreported or Overestimated?
    28 July 2021

    by Todd Kenyon PhD CFA
    …Double Standard

    Recent direct communications from CDC researchers confirm the difficulty of accurately attributing death to COVID-19. When looking for COVID-19 deaths due to vaccine “breakthroughs”, the CDC removes any vaccinated patients who test positive but clearly did not die from COVID-19; e.g., trauma or delivery patients (much like the WHO guidance). Of the remaining vaccinated patients who test positive and die, the CDC also ignores asymptomatic patients because “they were unlikely to be hospitalized due to COVID-19 if asymptomatic.” This is a common sense method hitherto ignored worldwide when attributing cases, hospitalizations and deaths for COVID. Of the remaining vaccinated patients who die and have a positive test, the CDC marks them “unknown”, because they say “it is challenging to determine the relationship between a SARS-CoV-2 infection and the reason a person was hospitalized or passed away.” Imagine if this were how we treated all hospitalizations and deaths over the past year – the numbers would be far lower… –

  14. Consider/correlate the following article with this summary: How Digital Vaccine Passports Pave Way for Unprecedented Surveillance Capitalism: “Gates’ ID2020 campaign has collaborated with the forces advancing a system that registers Americans’ vaccination status with the same corporation that calculates their financial credit score.” What do they want, altogether? What are their ultimate goals combined with hidden objectives? Is it a complete/all-encompassing Social Credit System (of “Tracking”), be it through Vaccine Passports, National IDs, or eventual Microchips? Will there come a time when we won’t be able to buy or sell without being a (targeted) part of it? Will we have a choice?

  15. The UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) summarising the excess mortality data are updating their 5 year base mortality average that’s used to determine the excess mortality, to include one of the years of the pandemic, which will obviously reduce the excess mortality calculated by many thousands (right at a time in the middle of the initial clump of vaccine deaths and obv when calculating the same longer term insofar as vaccine deaths also…)…. MUST BE JUST A COINCIDENCE that it’s happening right now **rolls eyes**

  16. Dude

    To say the MSM doesn’t cover this stuff because “they don’t care” is wrong. The media is owned lock stock and barrel by the same people who own our former western democracies and, yes, the pharmaceutical companies too (both own and are owned by).

    This is well established and you know it very well. So care or don’t care has squat to do with anything.

    They “cover” what they are told to cover period.

    1. To act like these people, as individuals, have no emotion one way or the other about what they are doing is ridiculous. Yes they do what they are told, as I have said many times, but they also have political views that drive their perception, many not even aware they are being manipulated. To ignore that, and how manufacturing consent is actually achieved is far to reductive.

  17. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla was talking about the safety profile of current zoster vaccines (shingles) which he believes could be improved with mRNA technology.
    He was not talking about the COVID-19 mRNA clot-shots.

    01/10/2022 CNBC Squawk Pod [37:55]

    [07:22] interview starts

    [07:33] Meg Tirrell: “Of course, you also expanded your relationship with BioNTech focusing on a shingles vaccine last week. So tell us about this strategy for Pfizer and expanding in messenger RNA and how much of a driver of your business going forward you expect that to be?”

    [08:25] Albert Bourla: “(…) we believe that there’s very high probability of delivering a solution to an unmet need not because the current zoster vaccines are not effective, but they are – don’t have the safety profile that we hope we can achieve with this technology.”

    don’t get me wrong, that guy is crazy..

    [07:47] Albert Bourla: “Well, I think it’s going to be a driver of finding solutions to unmet medical needs, and we have a very strong belief that the mRNA is a very powerful technology. All we do, it is trying to harness this technology for, for the best of mankind.”

    [09:00] Albert Bourla: “We, we did a lot of due diligence and we believe that the base technology is a technology that has the most promise in gene editing.”

    (DNA base gene editing, CRISPR)

    a poorly written transcript of the interview: (aka herpes zoster or zoster) (aka varicella)

  18. nope
    you’re confusing two different interviews

    ‘safety profile’ topic was at CNBC Squawk Box


    in the yahoo! finance interview from 01/10/2022 he says at 01:36

    “two doses of a vaccine offer very limited protection, if any” (against Omicron)
    “three doses – with a booster – they offer reasonable protection against hospitalisation and death”

    1. If you are fixated on the words “safety profile” I see why you are confused. I am aware of the two interviews. That is not what is in question. He very clearly said “two doses provide limited protection, if any” while discussing the Pfizer shot series. This is what I was addressing. That obviously does not meet the original safety profile, regardless of whether that article conflated the two interviews. I will address it in the show today.

  19. About ALC-0315 and ALC-0159 and what they say on the echelon site. I think they have two grades of product. The better is used in vaccines and sold to pfizer. The less good (less pure or whatever) is sold on the echelon site for research only. Does that make sense?

  20. All these new dangerous corona genome sequences… generated guesswork! No actual isolation, so EXACTLY what are they sequencing?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *