The Daily Wrap Up
Biowarfare Conspiracy Daily Wrap Up Government Health Podcast Politics Ryan Cristian Science Social Engineering Top News

PCR Illusion Continues, COVID And Your DNA, Vax Mix n’ Match Is Back & State Of Emergency Politics

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (6/19/21).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.


Click HERE For Super U

Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)

Doctor Vaccine Survey
Mixing Vaccines
Spike Protein/LNP/mRNA
Vaccine Passport

Important TLAV Mask Coverage

Most Recent Mask Studies

5 NIH/National Library of Medicine studies from 2004-2020 all finding verifiable health effects from wearing a face mask, including scientifically verified reduction is blood oxygen level:

Cloth Mask Study

SOME of the mask studies on efficacy:

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

10 Replies to “PCR Illusion Continues, COVID And Your DNA, Vax Mix n’ Match Is Back & State Of Emergency Politics

  1. Whether a government slows just parts of the web, such as social media platforms, or a country’s entire network, throttling produces similar results as other, more conspicuous, internet restrictions. … Throttling is rarely a practice unilaterally carried out by internet service providers (ISPs)…May 20, 2020

    Key Findings

    An increasing number of governments around the world are forcing internet service providers to slow their services during critical sociopolitical junctures—a practice known as throttling—infringing on citizens’ right to information and freedom of expression. Despite its deleterious impact on media development and foundational rights, throttling remains an often-neglected topic and risks becoming a pervasive, yet hidden, threat to press freedoms, democracy, and human rights.

    – Throttling refers to the intentional slowing of an internet service by an internet service provider.
    – It stifles the free flow of information during critical moments and prevents journalists from providing vital information to citizens abroad and at home.
    – Due to its difficulty to detect, throttling shields authorities from public scrutiny.
    – Businesses have a duty to be transparent about how and when governments force them to disrupt their services, yet often remain silent on the issue.

    Keep on Keepin on

  2. I wonder if that was done on purpose to never use the word coronavirus in mainstream news and major health and science news outlets. I remember researching SARS and thought it was strange they never talked about the type of virus it was like they do for every other viral disease. If we all knew about coronaviruses before this pandemic than few people would be scare and everyone would know you cannot make a real vaccine for coronaviruses. We would not have this craziness over vaccines or extending lockdowns if people knew this is not a vaccine.

  3. hmmm… I’m looking in your citations for the darkhorse link but don’t see it… do some of your links go through other links?

  4. Regarding vaccinating persons to protect others… It’s absolutely unethical but it has a long history in America.

    Kids get the rubella vaccine to protect pregnant women. (In most countries that don’t mandate this vaccine, rubella is so common in childhood that girls get it long before they can be pregnant, so it’s a non-issue.)

    When the hepatitis B vaccine was introduced in America it was aimed primarily at those at high risk for hepatitis B (promiscuous persons, IV drug users, etc…) It had very low uptake among those demographics because, well, they just aren’t that concerned about their health. So the CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices decided to mandate it FOR NEWBORNS ON DAY ONE (because parents might object to this vaccine that is generally unnecessary for children, but most parents aren’t thinking about the hospital giving a vaccine the day their child is born…) Some people misleadingly claim this is to protect newborns from hepatitis B that their mother may have. The reason this is misleading is children born to Hepatitis B positive mothers require Hepatitis B Immune Globulin in addition to vaccine so they can have antibodies immediately. The vaccine doesn’t result in immediate antibody production in protective amounts. No other nation mandates Hepatitis B vaccination on the day of birth.

    There are two approved Hepatitis B vaccines for newborns. ENGERIX-B was administered to 5071 healthy persons (neonates, infants, children, and adults) who were followed for 4 days after each dose (total doses 13,495). RECOMBIVAX-HB was administered to 147 healthy neonates/infants/children (434 doses) and 1,252 healthy adults (3,258 doses) who were followed for 5 days after each dose.

    ENGERIX-B Package Insert:
    “In 36 clinical studies, a total of 13,495 doses of ENGERIX-B were administered to 5,071 healthy
    adults and children who were initially seronegative for hepatitis B markers, and healthy
    neonates. All subjects were monitored for 4 days post-administration. Frequency of adverse
    reactions tended to decrease with successive doses of ENGERIX-B.”

    RECOMBIVAX-B Package Insert:
    “In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to 147 healthy
    infants and children (up to 10 years of age) who were monitored for 5 days after each dose.”
    “In a group of studies, 3258 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 10 mcg, were administered to 1252 healthy
    adults who were monitored for 5 days after each dose. “

  5. So, we’re supposed to believe that these fires out west are “normal” ? When these fire chiefs are saying there ” unprecedented ” . Explain this please.

    1. He didn’t say they are normal. He is just pointing out these are known issues that come with the job.

  6. You referenced a statement about how the snake oils may activate latent human retroviruses, whatever they are. What about the retro virus contaminates that have been in vaccines for decades?
    I was expecting covid-19 to at least partly, be a cover, for vaccine retro virus contaminates causing diseases.

  7. Hello Ryan, you probably doesn’t know this: the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine contains a sequence, coding for a molecule called Tissue Plasminogen Activator, tPA, which is an enzyme used in medicine to, who would have thought it, DISSOLVE BLOOD CLOT ! That means, right when they first developed this vaccine, they already knew that it will CAUSE BLOOD CLOTTING !!! So, they stupidly add this sequence as a component, in order to counteract the effect of blood clotting !!! Can you believe that ??!! I just discovered it today!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *