Article of the week Conspiracy Constitutional Rights Domestic Policy Government Health Human Rights Police State Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Social Change Social Engineering Technology Top News Whitney Webb World

Techno-Tyranny: How The US National Security State Is Using Coronavirus To Fulfill An Orwellian Vision

Last year, a government commission called for the US to adopt an AI-driven mass surveillance system far beyond that used in any other country in order to ensure American hegemony in artificial intelligence. Now, many of the “obstacles” they had cited as preventing its implementation are rapidly being removed under the guise of combating the coronavirus crisis.

Last year, a U.S. government body dedicated to examining how artificial intelligence can “address the national security and defense needs of the United States” discussed in detail the “structural” changes that the American economy and society must undergo in order to ensure a technological advantage over China, according to a recent document acquired through a FOIA request. This document suggests that the U.S. follow China’s lead and even surpass them in many aspects related to AI-driven technologies, particularly their use of mass surveillance. This perspective clearly clashes with the public rhetoric of prominent U.S. government officials and politicians on China, who have labeled the Chinese government’s technology investments and export of its surveillance systems and other technologies as a major “threat” to Americans’ “way of life.”

In addition, many of the steps for the implementation of such a program in the U.S., as laid out in this newly available document, are currently being promoted and implemented as part of the government’s response to the current coronavirus (Covid-19) crisis. This likely due to the fact that many members of this same body have considerable overlap with the taskforces and advisors currently guiding the government’s plans to “re-open the economy” and efforts to use technology to respond to the current crisis.

The FOIA document, obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), was produced by a little-known U.S. government organization called the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI). It was created by the 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and its official purpose is “to consider the methods and means necessary to advance the development of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and associated technologies to comprehensively address the national security and defense needs of the United States.”

The NSCAI is a key part of the government’s response to what is often referred to as the coming “fourth industrial revolution,” which has been described as “a revolution characterized by discontinuous technological development in areas like artificial intelligence (AI), big data, fifth-generation telecommunications networking (5G), nanotechnology and biotechnology, robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), and quantum computing.”

However, their main focus is ensuring that “the United States … maintain a technological advantage in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other associated technologies related to national security and defense.” The vice-chair of NSCAI, Robert Work – former Deputy Secretary of Defense and senior fellow at the hawkish Center for a New American Security (CNAS), described the commission’s purpose as determining “how the U.S. national security apparatus should approach artificial intelligence, including a focus on how the government can work with industry to compete with China’s ‘civil-military fusion’ concept.”

The recently released NSCAI document is a May 2019 presentation entitled “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview.” Throughout the presentation, the NSCAI promotes the overhaul of the U.S. economy and way of life as necessary for allowing the U.S. to ensure it holds a considerable technological advantage over China, as losing this advantage is currently deemed a major “national security” issue by the U.S. national security apparatus. This concern about maintaining a technological advantage can be seen in several other U.S. military documents and think tank reports, several of which have warned that the U.S.’ technological advantage is quickly eroding.

The U.S. government and establishment media outlets often blame alleged Chinese espionage or the Chinese government’s more explicit partnerships with private technology companies in support of their claim that the U.S. is losing this advantage over China. For instance, Chris Darby, the current CEO of the CIA’s In-Q-Tel, who is also on the NSCAI, told CBS News last year that China is the U.S.’ main competitor in terms of technology and that U.S. privacy laws were hampering the U.S.’ capacity to counter China in this regard, stating that:

“[D]ata is the new oil. And China is just awash with data. And they don’t have the same restraints that we do around collecting it and using it, because of the privacy difference between our countries. This notion that they have the largest labeled data set in the world is going to be a huge strength for them.”

In another example, Michael Dempsey – former acting Director of National Intelligence and currently a government-funded fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations – argued in The Hill that:

“It’s quite clear, though, that China is determined to erase our technological advantage, and is committing hundreds of billions of dollars to this effort. In particular, China is determined to be a world leader in such areas as artificial intelligence, high performance computing, and synthetic biology. These are the industries that will shape life on the planet and the military balance of power for the next several decades.”

In fact, the national security apparatus of the United States is so concerned about losing a technological edge over China that the Pentagon recently decided to join forces directly with the U.S. intelligence community in order “to get in front of Chinese advances in artificial intelligence.” This union resulted in the creation of the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC), which ties together “the military’s efforts with those of the Intelligence Community, allowing them to combine efforts in a breakneck push to move government’s AI initiatives forward.” It also coordinates with other government agencies, industry, academics, and U.S. allies. Robert Work, who subsequently became the NSCAI vice-chair, said at the time that JAIC’s creation was a “welcome first step in response to Chinese, and to a lesser extent, Russian, plans to dominate these technologies.”

Similar concerns about “losing” technological advantage to China have also been voiced by the NSCAI chairman, Eric Schmidt, the former head of Alphabet – Google’s parent company, who argued in February in the New York Times that Silicon Valley could soon lose “the technology wars” to China if the U.S. government doesn’t take action. Thus, the three main groups represented within the NSCAI – the intelligence community, the Pentagon and Silicon Valley – all view China’s advancements in AI as a major national security threat (and in Silicon Valley’s case, threat to their bottom lines and market shares) that must be tackled quickly.

Targeting China’s “adoption advantage”

In the May 2019 “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview” presentation, the NSCAI discusses that, while the U.S. still leads in the “creation” stage of AI and related technologies, it lags behind China in the “adoption” stage due to “structural factors.” It says that “creation”, followed by “adoption” and “iteration” are the three phases of the “life cycle of new tech” and asserts that failing to dominate in the “adoption” stage will allow China to “leapfrog” the U.S. and dominate AI for the foreseeable future.

The presentation also argues that, in order to “leapfrog” competitors in emerging markets, what is needed is not “individual brilliance” but instead specific “structural conditions that exist within certain markets.” It cites several case studies where China is considered to be “leapfrogging” the U.S. due to major differences in these “structural factors.” Thus, the insinuation of the document (though not directly stated) is that the U.S. must alter the “structural factors” that are currently responsible for its lagging behind China in the “adoption” phase of AI-driven technologies.

Chief among the troublesome “structural factors” highlighted in this presentation are so-called “legacy systems” that are common in the U.S. but much less so in China. The NSCAI document states that examples of “legacy systems” include a financial system that still utilizes cash and card payments, individual car ownership and even receiving medical attention from a human doctor. It states that, while these “legacy systems” in the US are “good enough,” too many “good enough” systems “hinder the adoption of new things,” specifically AI-driven systems.

Another structural factor deemed by the NSCAI to be an obstacle to the U.S.’ ability to maintain a technological advantage over China is the “scale of the consumer market,” arguing that “extreme urban density = on-demand service adoption.” In other words, extreme urbanization results in more people using online or mobile-based “on-demand” services, ranging from ride-sharing to online shopping. It also cites the use of mass surveillance on China’s “huge population base” is an example of how China’s “scale of consumer market” advantage allowing “China to leap ahead” in the fields of related technologies, like facial recognition.

In addition to the alleged shortcomings of the U.S.’ “legacy systems” and lack of “extreme urban density,” the NSCAI also calls for more “explicit government support and involvement” as a means to speed up the adoption of these systems in the U.S. This includes the government lending its stores of data on civilians to train AI, specifically citing facial recognition databases, and mandating that cities be “re-architected around AVs [autonomous vehicles],” among others. Other examples given include the government investing large amounts of money in AI start-ups and adding tech behemoths to a national, public-private AI taskforce focused on smart city-implementation (among other things).

With regards to the latter, the document says “this level of public-private cooperation” in China is “outwardly embraced” by the parties involved, with this “serving as a stark contrast to the controversy around Silicon Valley selling to the U.S. government.” Examples of such controversy, from the NSCAI’s perspective, likely include Google employees petitioning to end the Google-Pentagon “Project Maven,” which uses Google’s AI software to analyze footage captured by drones. Google eventually chose not to renew its Maven contract as a result of the controversy, even though top Google executives viewed the project as a “golden opportunity” to collaborate more closely with the military and intelligence communities.

The document also defines another aspect of government support as the “clearing of regulatory barriers.” This term is used in the document specifically with respect to U.S. privacy laws, despite the fact that the U.S. national security state has long violated these laws with near complete impunity. However, the document seems to suggest that privacy laws in the U.S. should be altered so that what the U.S. government has done “in secret” with private citizen data can be done more openly and more extensively. The NSCAI document also discusses the removal of “regulatory barriers” in order to speed up the adoption of self-driving cars, even though autonomous driving technology has resulted in several deadly and horrific car accidents and presents other safety concerns.

Also discussed is how China’s “adoption advantage” will “allow it to leapfrog the U.S.” in several new fields, including “AI medical diagnosis” and “smart cities.” It then asserts that “the future will be decided at the intersection of private enterprise and policy leaders between China and the U.S.” If this coordination over the global AI market does not occur, the document warns that “we [the U.S.] risk being left out of the discussions where norms around AI are set for the rest of our lifetimes.”

The presentation also dwells considerably on how “the main battleground [in technology] are not the domestic Chinese and US markets,” but what it refers to as the NBU (next billion users) markets, where it states that “Chinese players will aggressively challenge Silicon Valley.” In order to challenge them more successfully, the presentation argues that, “just like we [view] the market of teenagers as a harbinger for new trends, we should look at China.”

The document also expresses concerns about China exporting AI more extensively and intensively than the U.S., saying that China is “already crossing borders” by helping to build facial databases in Zimbabwe and selling image recognition and smart city systems to Malaysia. If allowed to become “the unambiguous leader in AI,” it says that “China could end up writing much of the rulebook of international norms around the deployment of AI” and that it would “broaden China’s sphere of influence amongst an international community that increasingly looks to the pragmatic authoritarianism of China and Singapore as an alternative to Western liberal democracy.”

What will replace the US’ “legacy systems”?

Given that the document makes it quite clear that “legacy systems” in the U.S. are impeding its ability to prevent China from “leapfrogging” ahead in AI and then dominating it for the foreseeable future, it is also important to examine what the document suggests should replace these “legacy systems” in the U.S.

As previously mentioned, one “legacy system” cited early on in the presentation is the main means of payment for most Americans, cash and credit/debit cards. The presentation asserts, in contrast to these “legacy systems” that the best and most advanced system is moving entirely to smartphone-based digital wallets.

It notes specifically the main mobile wallet provider in India, PayTM, is majority owned by Chinese companies. It quotes an article, which states that “a big break came [in 2016] when India canceled 86% of currency in circulation in an effort to cut corruption and bring more people into the tax net by forcing them to use less cash.” At the time, claims that India’s 2016 “currency reform” would be used as a stepping stone towards a cashless society were dismissed by some as “conspiracy theory.” However, last year, a committee convened by India’s central bank (and led by an Indian tech oligarch who also created India’s massive civilian biometric database) resulted in the Indian government’s “Cashless India” program.

Regarding India’s 2016 “currency reform,” the NSCAI document then asserts that “this would be unfathomable in the West. And unsurprisingly, when 86% of the cash got cancelled and nobody had a credit card, mobile wallets in India exploded, laying the groundwork for a far more advanced payments ecosystem in India than the US.” However, it has become increasingly less unfathomable in light of the current coronavirus crisis, which has seen efforts to reduce the amount of cash used because paper bills may carry the virus as well as efforts to introduce a Federal Reserve-backed “digital dollar.”

In addition, the NSCAI document from last May calls for the end of in-person shopping and promotes moving towards all shopping being performed online. It argues that “American companies have a lot to gain by adopting ideas from Chinese companies” by shifting towards exclusive e-commerce purchasing options. It states that only shopping online provides a “great experience” and also adds that “when buying online is literally the only way to get what you want, consumers go online.”

Another “legacy system” that the NSCAI seeks to overhaul is car ownership, as it promotes autonomous, or self-driving vehicles and further asserts that “fleet ownership > individual ownership.” It specifically points to a need for “a centralized ride-sharing network,” which it says “is needed to coordinate cars to achieve near 100% utilization rates.” However, it warns against ride-sharing networks that “need a human operator paired with each vehicle” and also asserts that “fleet ownership makes more sense” than individual car ownership. It also specifically calls for these fleets to not only be composed of self-driving cars, but electric cars and cites reports that China “has the world’s most aggressive electric vehicle goals….and seek[s] the lead in an emerging industry.”

The document states that China leads in ride-sharing today even though ride-sharing was pioneered first in the U.S. It asserts once again that the U.S. “legacy system” of individual car ownership and lack of “extreme urban density” are responsible for China’s dominance in this area. It also predicts that China will “achieve mass autonomous [vehicle] adoption before the U.S.,” largely because “the lack of mass car ownership [in China] leads to far more consumer receptiveness to AVs [autonomous vehicles].” It then notes that “earlier mass adoption leads to a virtuous cycle that allows Chinese core self-driving tech to accelerate beyond [its] Western counterparts.”

In addition to their vision for a future financial system and future self-driving transport system, the NSCAI has a similarly dystopian vision for surveillance. The document calls mass surveillance “one of the ‘first-and-best customers’ for AI” and “a killer application for deep learning.” It also states that “having streets carpeted with cameras is good infrastructure.”

It then discusses how “an entire generation of AI unicorn” companies are “collecting the bulk of their early revenue from government security contracts” and praises the use of AI in facilitating policing activities. For instance, it lauds reports that “police are making convictions based on phone calls monitored with iFlyTek’s voice-recognition technology” and that “police departments are using [AI] facial recognition tech to assist in everything from catching traffic law violators to resolving murder cases.”

On the point of facial recognition technology specifically, the NSCAI document asserts that China has “leapt ahead” of the US on facial recognition, even though “breakthroughs in using machine learning for image recognition initially occurred in the US.” It claims that China’s advantage in this instance is because they have government-implemented mass surveillance (“clearing of regulatory barriers”), enormous government-provided stores of data (“explicit government support”) combined with private sector databases on a huge population base (“scale of consumer market”). As a consequence of this, the NSCAI argues, China is also set to leap ahead of the U.S. in both image/facial recognition and biometrics.

The document also points to another glaring difference between the U.S. and its rival, stating that: “In the press and politics of America and Europe, Al is painted as something to be feared that is eroding privacy and stealing jobs. Conversely, China views it as both a tool for solving major macroeconomic challenges in order to sustain their economic miracle, and an opportunity to take technological leadership on the global stage.”

The NSCAI document also touches on the area of healthcare, calling for the implementation of a system that seems to be becoming reality thanks to the current coronavirus crisis. In discussing the use of AI in healthcare (almost a year before the current crisis began), it states that “China could lead the world in this sector” and “this could lead to them exporting their tech and setting international norms.” One reason for this is also that China has “far too few doctors for the population” and calls having enough doctors for in-person visits a “legacy system.” It also cited U.S. regulatory measures such as “HIPPA compliance and FDA approval” as obstacles that don’t constrain Chinese authorities.

More troubling, it argues that “the potential impact of government supplied data is even more significant in biology and healthcare,” and says it is likely that “the Chinese government [will] require every single citizen to have their DNA sequenced and stored in government databases, something nearly impossible to imagine in places as privacy conscious as the U.S. and Europe.” It continues by saying that “the Chinese apparatus is well-equipped to take advantage” and calls these civilian DNA databases a “logical next step.”

Who are the NSCAI?

Given the sweeping changes to the U.S. that the NSCAI promoted in this presentation last May, it becomes important to examine who makes up the commission and to consider their influence over U.S. policy on these matters, particularly during the current crisis. As previously mentioned, the chairman of the NSCAI is Eric Schmidt, the former head of Alphabet (Google’s parent company) who has also invested heavily in Israeli intelligence-linked tech companies including the controversial start-up “incubator” Team8. In addition, the committee’s vice-chair is Robert Work, is not only a former top Pentagon official, but is currently working with the think tank CNAS, which is run by John McCain’s long-time foreign policy adviser and Joe Biden’s former national security adviser.

Other members of the NSCAI are as follows:

  • Safra Catz, CEO of Oracle, with close ties to Trump’s top donor Sheldon Adelson
  • Steve Chien, supervisor of the Artificial Intelligence Group at Caltech’s Jet Propulsion Lab
  • Mignon Clyburn, Open Society Foundation fellow and former FCC commissioner
  • Chris Darby, CEO of In-Q-Tel (CIA’s venture capital arm)
  • Ken Ford, CEO of the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
  • Jose-Marie Griffiths, president of Dakota State University and former National Science Board member
  • Eric Horvitz, director of Microsoft Research Labs
  • Andy Jassy, CEO of Amazon Web Services (CIA contractor)
  • Gilman Louie, partner at Alsop Louie Partners and former CEO of In-Q-Tel
  • William Mark, director of SRI International and former Lockheed Martin director
  • Jason Matheny, director of the Center for Security and Emerging Technology, former Assistant director of National Intelligence and former director of IARPA (Intelligence Advanced Research Project Agency)
  • Katharina McFarland, consultant at Cypress International and former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition
  • Andrew Moore, head of Google Cloud AI

As can be seen in the list above, there is a considerable amount of overlap between the NSCAI and the companies currently advising the White House on “re-opening” the economy (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Lockheed Martin, Oracle) and one NSCAI member, Oracle’s Safra Katz, is on the White House’s “economic revival” taskforce. Also, there is also overlap between the NSCAI and the companies that are intimately involved in the implementation of the “contact tracing” “coronavirus surveillance system,” a mass surveillance system promoted by the Jared Kushner-led, private-sector coronavirus task force. That surveillance system is set to be constructed by companies with deep ties to Google and the U.S. national security state, and both Google and Apple, who create the operating systems for the vast majority of smartphones used in the U.S., have said they will now build that surveillance system directly into their smartphone operating systems.

Also notable is the fact that In-Q-Tel and the U.S. intelligence community has considerable representation on the NSCAI and that they also boast close ties with Google, Palantir and other Silicon Valley giants, having been early investors in those companies. Both Google and Palantir, as well as Amazon (also on the NSCAI) are also major contractors for U.S. intelligence agencies. In-Q-Tel’s involvement on the NSCAI is also significant because they have been heavily promoting mass surveillance of consumer electronic devices for use in pandemics for the past several years. Much of that push has come from In-Q-Tel’s current Executive Vice President Tara O’Toole, who was previously the director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and also co-authored several controversial biowarfare/pandemic simulations, such as Dark Winter.

In addition, since at least January, the U.S. intelligence community and the Pentagon have been at the forefront of developing the U.S. government’s still-classified “9/11-style” response plans for the coronavirus crisis, alongside the National Security Council. Few news organizations have noted that these classified response plans, which are set to be triggered if and when the U.S. reaches a certain number of coronavirus cases, has been created largely by elements of the national security state (i.e. the NSC, Pentagon, and intelligence), as opposed to civilian agencies or those focused on public health issues.

Furthermore, it has been reported that the U.S. intelligence community as well as U.S. military intelligence knew by at least January (though recent reports have said as early as last November) that the coronavirus crisis would reach “pandemic proportions” by March. The American public were not warned, but elite members of the business and political classes were apparently informed, given the record numbers of CEO resignations in January and several high-profile insider trading allegations that preceded the current crisis by a matter of weeks.

Perhaps even more disconcerting is the added fact that the U.S. government not only participated in the eerily prescient pandemic simulation last October known as Event 201, it also led a series of pandemic response simulations last year. Crimson Contagion was a series of four simulations that involved 19 U.S. federal agencies, including intelligence and the military, as well as 12 different states and a host of private sector companies that simulated a devastating pandemic influenza outbreak that had originated in China. It was led by the current HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Robert Kadlec, who is a former lobbyist for military and intelligence contractors and a Bush-era homeland security “bioterrorism” advisor.

In addition, both Kadlec and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, which was intimately involved in Event 201, have direct ties to the controversial June 2001 biowarfare exercise “Dark Winter,” which predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks that transpired just months later in disturbing ways. Though efforts by media and government were made to blame the anthrax attacks on a foreign source, the anthrax was later found to have originated at a U.S. bioweapons lab and the FBI investigation into the case has been widely regarded as a cover-up, including by the FBI’s once-lead investigator on that case.

Given the above, it is worth asking if those who share the NSCAI’s vision saw the coronavirus pandemic early on as an opportunity to make the “structural changes” it had deemed essential to countering China’s lead in the mass adoption of AI-driven technologies, especially considering that many of the changes in the May 2019 document are now quickly taking place under the guise of combatting the coronavirus crisis.

The NSCAI’s vision takes shape

Though the May 2019 NSCAI document was authored nearly a year ago, the coronavirus crisis has resulted in the implementation of many of the changes and the removal of many of the “structural” obstacles that the commission argued needed to be drastically altered in order to ensure a technological advantage over China in the field of AI. The aforementioned move away from cash, which is taking place not just in the U.S. but internationally, is just one example of many.

For instance, earlier this week CNN reported that grocery stores are now considering banning in-person shopping and that the U.S. Department of Labor has recommended that retailers nationwide start “‘using a drive-through window or offering curbside pick-up’ to protect workers for exposure to coronavirus.” In addition, last week, the state of Florida approved an online-purchase plan for low income families using the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Other reports have argued that social distancing inside grocery stores is ineffective and endangering people’s lives. As previously mentioned, the May 2019 NSCAI document argues that moving away from in-person shopping is necessary to mitigate China’s “adoption advantage” and also argued that “when buying online is literally the only way to get what you want, consumers go online.”

Reports have also argued that these changes in shopping will last far beyond coronavirus, such as an article by Business Insider entitled “The coronavirus pandemic is pushing more people online and will forever change how Americans shop for groceries, experts say.” Those cited in the piece argue that this shift away from in-person shopping will be “permanent” and also states that “More people are trying these services than otherwise would have without this catalyst and gives online players a greater chance to acquire and keep a new customer base.” A similar article in Yahoo! News argues that, thanks to the current crisis, “our dependence on online shopping will only rise because no one wants to catch a virus at a shop.”

In addition, the push towards the mass use of self-driving cars has also gotten a boost thanks to coronavirus, with driverless cars now making on-demand deliveries in California. Two companies, one Chinese-owned and the other backed by Japan’s SoftBank, have since been approved to have their self-driving cars used on California roads and that approval was expedited due to the coronavirus crisis. The CPO of Nuro Inc., the SoftBank-backed company, was quoted in Bloomberg as saying that “The Covid-19 pandemic has expedited the public need for contactless delivery services. Our R2 fleet is custom-designed to change the very nature of driving and the movement of goods by allowing people to remain safely at home while their groceries, medicines, and packages are brought to them.” Notably, the May 2019 NSCAI document references the inter-connected web of SoftBank-backed companies, particularly those backed by its largely Saudi-funded “Vision Fund,” as forming “the connective tissue for a global federation of tech companies” set to dominate AI.

California isn’t the only state to start using self-driving cars, as the Mayo Clinic of Florida is now also using them. “Using artificial intelligence enables us to protect staff from exposure to this contagious virus by using cutting-edge autonomous vehicle technology and frees up staff time that can be dedicated to direct treatment and care for patients,” Kent Thielen, M.D., CEO of Mayo Clinic in Florida stated in a recent press release cited by Mic.

Like the changes to in-person shopping in the age of coronavirus, other reports assert that self-driving vehicles are here to stay. One report published by Mashable is entitled “It took a coronavirus outbreak for self-driving cars to become more appealing,” and opens by stating “Suddenly, a future full of self-driving cars isn’t just a sci-fi pipe dream. What used to be considered a scary, uncertain technology for many Americans looks more like an effective tool to protect ourselves from a fast-spreading, infectious disease.” It further argues that this is hardly a “fleeting shift” in driving habits and one tech CEO cited in the piece, Anuja Sonalker of Steer Tech, claims that “There has been a distinct warming up to human-less, contactless technology. Humans are biohazards, machines are not.”

Another focus of the NSCAI presentation, AI medicine, has also seen its star rise in recent weeks. For instance, several reports have touted how AI-driven drug discovery platforms have been able to identify potential treatments for coronavirus. Microsoft, whose research lab director is on the NSCAI, recently put $20 million into its “AI for health” program to speed up the use of AI in analyzing coronavirus data. In addition, “telemedicine”– a form of remote medical care – has also become widely adopted due to the coronavirus crisis.

Several other AI-driven technologies have similarly become more widely adopted thanks to coronavirus, including the use of mass surveillance for “contact tracing” as well as facial recognition technology and biometrics. A recent Wall Street Journal report stated that the government is seriously considering both contact tracing via phone geolocation data and facial recognition technology in order to track those who might have coronavirus. In addition, private businesses – like grocery stores and restaurants – are using sensors and facial recognition to see how many people and which people are entering their stores.

As far as biometrics go, university researchers are now working to determine if “smartphones and biometric wearables already contain the data we need to know if we have become infected with the novel coronavirus.” Those efforts seek to detect coronavirus infections early by analyzing “sleep schedules, oxygen levels, activity levels and heart rate” based on smartphone apps like FitBit and smartwatches. In countries outside the U.S., biometric IDs are being touted as a way to track those who have and lack immunity to coronavirus.

In addition, one report in The Edge argued that the current crisis is changing what types of biometrics should be used, asserting that a shift towards thermal scanning and facial recognition is necessary:

“At this critical juncture of the crisis, any integrated facial recognition and thermal scanning solution must be implemented easily, rapidly and in a cost-effective manner. Workers returning to offices or factories must not have to scramble to learn a new process or fumble with declaration forms. They must feel safe and healthy for them to work productively. They just have to look at the camera and smile. Cameras and thermal scanners, supported by a cloud-based solution and the appropriate software protocols, will do the rest.”

Also benefiting from the coronavirus crisis is the concept of “smart cities,” with Forbes recently writing that “Smart cities can help us combat the coronavirus pandemic.” That article states that “Governments and local authorities are using smart city technology, sensors and data to trace the contacts of people infected with the coronavirus. At the same time, smart cities are also helping in efforts to determine whether social distancing rules are being followed.”

That article in Forbes also contains the following passage:

“…[T]he use of masses of connected sensors makes it clear that the coronavirus pandemic is–intentionally or not–being used as a testbed for new surveillance technologies that may threaten privacy and civil liberties. So aside from being a global health crisis, the coronavirus has effectively become an experiment in how to monitor and control people at scale.”

Another report in The Guardian states that “If one of the government takeaways from coronavirus is that ‘smart cities’ including Songdo or Shenzhen are safer cities from a public health perspective, then we can expect greater efforts to digitally capture and record our behaviour in urban areas – and fiercer debates over the power such surveillance hands to corporations and states.” There have also been reports that assert that typical cities are “woefully unprepared” to face pandemics compared to “smart cities.”

Yet, beyond many of the NSCAI’s specific concerns regarding mass AI adoption being conveniently resolved by the current crisis, there has also been a concerted effort to change the public’s perception of AI in general. As previously mentioned, the NSCAI had pointed out last year that:

“In the press and politics of America and Europe, Al is painted as something to be feared that is eroding privacy and stealing jobs. Conversely, China views it as both a tool for solving major macroeconomic challenges in order to sustain their economic miracle, and an opportunity to take technological leadership on the global stage.”

Now, less than a year later, the coronavirus crisis has helped spawn a slew of headlines in just the last few weeks that paint AI very differently, including “How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Fight Coronavirus,” “How AI May Prevent the Next Coronavirus Outbreak,” “AI Becomes an Ally in the Fight Against COVID-19,” “Coronavirus: AI steps up in battle against COVID-19,” and “Here’s How AI Can Help Africa Fight the Coronavirus,” among numerous others.

It is indeed striking how the coronavirus crisis has seemingly fulfilled the NSCAI’s entire wishlist and removed many of the obstacles to the mass adoption of AI technologies in the United States. Like major crises of the past, the national security state appears to be using the chaos and fear to promote and implement initiatives that would be normally rejected by Americans and, if history is any indicator, these new changes will remain long after the coronavirus crisis fades from the news cycle. It is essential that these so-called “solutions” be recognized for what they are and that we consider what type of world they will end up creating – an authoritarian technocracy. We ignore the rapid advance of these NSCAI-promoted initiatives and the phasing out of so-called “legacy systems” (and with them, many long-cherished freedoms) at our own peril.

Whitney Webb
Whitney Webb is a staff writer for The Last American Vagabond. She has previously written for Mintpress News, Ben Swann's Truth In Media. Her work has appeared on Global Research, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She currently lives with her family in southern Chile.

55 Replies to “Techno-Tyranny: How The US National Security State Is Using Coronavirus To Fulfill An Orwellian Vision

  1. No mention of A I voting. People’s choices are completely overlooked, and this tech is their enemy as well as the legislators that are promoting their love affair with communist China.

    1. Of course AI machines will not be able to vote, or at least, the 1% will make sure it does not matter either.

      1. damn, China hasn’t been a communist for a while, it’s the most powerful capitalist state in the world, as much as the US is no longer a democracy. It’s neoliberalism … Think about Jack Ma.

    2. You think there may be a connection between the push for electric cars and U.S. regime change of Venezuela endeavor? I believe Venezuela has large lithium deposits ….just a thought

      ai will compete with humans ofr energy consummation and win. ai’s take 50% of total energy generated in usa and demand even more. this dilemma was forecast many years ago by scifi writers.

      reducing human energy needs is the tradeoff made by our leaders to win the ai wars with china. i question whether 320 million people in us will provide enough data to train our ai’s learning curve. china has hacked irs, credit services, private databases in the recent past. the ‘adoption phase’ will be contested area for legacy systems survival.

      the main concern is the ‘iteration phase’ which will be conducted without human oversight. ai’s will determine how they communicate and set interoperability standards independent of human controls. this is what elon musk warned about on joe rogan show. this part of ai report is classified to avoid panic of oncoming roboapocolypse.
      do we have any say in the skynet future thats rolling out?

      1. You say USA population of 320 million, obviously you haven’t seen the UN Sustainable figures for 2025…. 65 million, which will be accomplished by the 3 rd and 4 th waves planned,no matter what, via injection of the Biological ‘life saver’ to this Fake plandemic…

      2. There is no competition between China and the USA! Its called Kabuki Theater. They are both run by the same INTL banking cartel. Unless someone changed the rules and made the borrower Supreme over the lender while I was sleeping. You are brainwashed . This is nothing but UN Agenda 21 world totalitarian govt.

    4. I just reread this article again ( I revisit it as our new world takes shape) and it sort of puts the whole ‘defund the police’ thing in perspective along with the protests and riots that had not started yet when this article was published… Awesome job Whitney

  2. The arrogance and Psychopathy is breathtaking. How are we ever going to fight this? I have been working at the state level to control 5G deployment and there are good people there. We had a few stunning success. Never give up!

    I am not giving up my “legacy systems.” Headed out of the city and going as remote as possible, garden, hope to get friendly with local farmers and survive.

    We should all think about starting local currency systems.

    God bless us each and every one!

    1. Thanks to Ryan, whitney and the whole staff in the last American vagabond. You guys are a voice of truth and fact. A voice for the voiceless. This is the greatest thing I’ve ever read in my life. Brilliant and full of fact. For that I would like to thank from the bottom of my heart. Keep up the great work I am a fun unit my wheels come out. I hope people wake up and resist after all we are the 99%.

      1. Great work! A quest for the truth amid all the noises and well intended confusions out there.
        You guys,you are the soldiers of the Truth.

        As they’re unveiling their satanic global agenda, hope for humanity comes from those of us who understand their game plan and stay alert to inform others.We do not consent!

  3. Thank you again Whitney for yet another investigative masterpiece. Seems as though the more invisible the enemy is, the larger the fabricated specter is, and the more control they can achieve. Which frightens me when I have read headlines about 2019 being the “banner year for credible UFO sightings”. Oh my, what structural restrictions they can remove with the threat of advanced alien life forms threatening the human race.

    1. Looks like the Crusade episode, “Visitors From Down the Street” is revelation, except that instead of extraterrestrials being the alleged victims and Earthlings being alleged perps, it is the reverse (but still the same playbook by someone — this time us). No doubt about it, Faux News and Clinton News Network will soon be telling us anonymous sources in the “intelligence community” have determined that Xe and Putin are Niburu and Anunnaki lap-dogs if current trends continue much longer.

  4. The view from within the tech industry is a bit different from what’s seen in public. We see the MBA’s who have usurped the voices of real engineers and scientists. We see the many layers of middle management without an iota of creativity. We’ve seen the West’s technical capabilities eroded and sabotaged over the past several decades. What you read in these reports is mostly smoke and mirrors. None of it will actually work. People with real smarts avoid the Bill Gates of the world like a plague. The real pandemic is the overflowing swamp of lies and misdirection. The empire is on its last gasp. Make your own decisions about how you want to live. Get yourselves to safety. Warn the others, but don’t get drawn down with them.

    1. i believe the hubris in the harvard mba circles that you’re describing. their hubris will be their demise.

      1. Harvard=DershowitzEpsteinZionismUsury&Larceny to enrich psychopathic preditors What could more Unaccountable than AI… Show us their results, or are we seeing it now in the bodies stacked on the street. Did AI done it?????? A clever “crisper” cut & paste of bat aids….?????? It could be Bubonic Bats Bugery next time….

    2. You are correct, sir! The more intricately you build the machine, the more likely its failure. Not to mention that all machines fail sooner or later, no matter how much they cost. See Navy and Air Force for prime examples. “Open the pod bay door, Hal!” “Mary had a little lamb…..”

      It is not technology per se that we must fear: it is the misapplication and mal-application by greedy criminals in high places that must be addressed.

  5. These authoritarian technocrats will get what they want – more (eventually total) control – because they know how to use “fear” and force to control the narrative. As we willingly comply to their bold, diabolical and mendacious agenda our privacy and liberty will slowly be stripped away and the surveillance state will remain. We need to continue to speak out and find ways to opt out of the coronavirus world order.


    “Gates has known Nilekani, one of India’s most prominent entrepreneurs and philanthropists, for more than twenty years, and for just as long, Gates has admired the entrepreneur’s dedication to applying technology to alleviate poverty. Nilekani and his wife, Rohini, run a nonprofit that uses apps to help children with early learning.

    “Nandan and I share a common optimism about the potential of the digital revolution in India to improve lives through access to savings accounts, health records, and education,” Gates says.

    Nilekani currently serves as the chairman of India’s new identity card system, which provides biometric IDs to more than one billion people.”

  7. lv
    i would like to read in depth reports on chinese ownership of american corporations since 2000, especially gooble, facefuck and twitter. they are after the special access programs (sap) that are hidden in private corporations. we’re in a biowar with communist party globalists. no info in the msm. fill the gap. keep the insights coming

    1. U.S. ownership of Chinese corporations is probably more revealing. What probably happened is that an attempt to purchase China lock, stock, and barrel at our expense failed. The both factions of the corporatist Demopublican Party are in a war against the rest of the planet and 99% of the U.S. domestic population. Now it is a biowar and the next 9% and another 30-40% who get conned by Faux “Business”, “positive”-“thinking”, faux populists, and other “media” and cults most likely still antagonistically object to any attempts to talk some sense into them.

      Hopefully, soon, somehow, there will be some camps north of Yellowknife to warehouse the dangerous cracked pots in.

      1. agreed. but they don’t have enough control or competency (as they pretend or believe to have) that they need, and, with vigilance and BDS, we may be able to expedite the crumbling of their system.

      2. I can tell you that I already live in a concrete built concentration area designed by a Communist government for mass surveillance and control purposes. No personal car, symbolic amount of tokens for current expenses, almost no medical assistance, taxes amounting to 70% of a 600$ minimal wage which is almost universal, 80% of all working people enjoy it, pervasive phone and internet surveillance, crazy levels of political propaganda etc. etc. In not so many words: You’ll get used to it. Eventually.

  8. Conflict of Interest statement (Castagna/Gilead)

    “Dr. Castagna reports personal fees from Gilead Sciences, personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, personal fees from JanssenCilag, personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Theratechnologies, outside the submitted work; .”

    Dr. Fauci quote from the article linked below.
    “On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.2 ”

    All of the articles on New England Journal of Medicine have conflict of interest disclosures. This could be very valuable for cross reference.

    1. Notice the “666”…nasty stuff. Bill Gates and his cronies should answer to the American people and face trial (if we still have any legal justice in courts) for their plans to enslave us to be used as batteries for their dystopian system and strip us of our freedoms (and humanity). People need to not comply and empower themselves with what is truly going on!

  9. Excellent article, Whitney.
    I am unable to give financial support, but am definitely becomming a “click & share” freedom fighter. I’m working a few of my own angles too re health, the billionaires club, 5G/AI. The WEF white paper on 5G will also show people that EVERYTHING is to be automated. Thanks for connecting everything so beautifully in your article. I pray it wakes people up! I’m not living in fear of a virus, I am truly frigtened about the future of our republic. America is standing in the way of a global take over. Will she succeed?

  10. thank you again for naming the names and connecting the dots. your work will help put some fear in the thugs’ empty heart. your work will be shared widely and as far as possible.

  11. Too true. However consider this. The way computers work. Line by line. Digit by digit. Byte by byte. Processors do get faster. Deep -penetration- ‘learning’ is s furfy helps however they are still an abacus in that they calculate, they cannot anticipate except in mathematical probables not actual actualities. In the AI lexicon the myth is ahead of apart from the mayhem the actual results. Recognition tech-app in the PRC is not doing very well. Israel may crow but what do they have for show? A population which is not cowed. Then back to the mainframe computers are hopeless in functioning as advertised. On the bus the other day, as it was stationary, its computer guided engine control oversight system in sudden emergency mode informed the driver the bus had exceeded 100 kph – while stationary! How often has your computer frozen as you type away, and suddenly with several windows open it freezes. Sometimes only a reboot clears the computer simply not being able to compute anything that is even within its own capabilities. As well as codes corrupting all on their own as my first webmistress told me – and so much more. The point being. That they can waste their millions on this AI surveillance. Sig-int is always the preferred US option. Let them delude themselves given Hum-Int is what works in the end. That is how the East German Communist state worked so well. Until humans overrode the system. Because computers cannot predict the unpredictable- and these are us analogue humans.

  12. Wow! Thank you so much for a calm lucid and thorough breakdown. I’m teaching in Nanjing (US citizen) at the moment and your focus on China is much appreciated.

  13. Read “Under an Ionized Sky” by Elana Freeland if you want to get the full scope of this Brave New World the Pentagon, Wall Street and Silicone Valley is shoving down our throats.

    If 1/10 of what she’s writing about is true, we’re screwed.

  14. The result will be global communitarianusm. Oren Etzioni is another name you might recognize for his role in developing AI. His dad, Amitai Etzioni, is the self proclaimed guru of American Communitarianusm. Would like to gift you a copy of our books, The Anti Communitarian Manifesto and 2020: Our Common Destiny for a review. Are you open to that? Admire and respect the work you’re doing. Appreciate it.

  15. It seems that what is referred to as “legacy” systems relate directly to the American desire for freedom, civil rights, and privacy…To surpass China the US would have to adopt a govt similar to the CCP that controls virtually every aspect of life of the people…I didn’t vote for that sort of govt…The supposed national security need for this has nothing to do with upholding the Constitution or our Bill of Rights…It’s about developing a totalitarian govt in Amerika and shredding the Constitution once and for all rather than the current secretive ways it is ignored…

  16. Great article, but why does it talk about “the virus” as if it is actually a legitimate thing getting tons of people sick?

  17. thanks for posting this. i grew up in silicon valley and have avoided most tech mostly because it’s not necessary, and it’s always marketed as the end all be all of everything forever. there’s an ap for that, there’s an ap for that, is there an ap to make you guys shut up?!

    it’s nice to read an article with the whole game plan spelled out.. even though you can just feel it when you look at the way all the “solutions” are magically orchestrated over the global media, even when they are all nonsense.

    china doesn’t honor international copyright law.. this is one reason they are so rich! to just call them an industry leader or say they will outpace anyone due to ai is obnoxious. their population has increased from 1 B to 1.5 B almost overnight (much like india’s population) – many of their citizens have to have aps to monitor the number of smog particulates in the air to see if it’s safe to go outside to breath on any given day. china is the country the u.s. is eager to copy?

    autocorrect doesn’t even work, yet we are supposed to become more comfortable with robots than interacting with other people? we have all seen photos of failed bicycle share companies’ bikes packed high to the sky after people refused to use them. are we going to have to sit here and watch this shit show only to eventually see ai robots and ai doctors and ai cars stacked as high?

    are people seriously going to accept this? do they really think they can eliminate a black market? even with the current level of freedom (which is minimal) there is still a black market. how stupid do they think we are? in the soviet union people traded vodka. what are they going to do put a tracking device on all the hard liquor? do they think we won’t be able to pour it into a different bottle?

    i can’t watch. i’m watching chef ramsay for an anger outlet and to reminisce on all the fine dining i never bothered to take advantage of. i hope more states open and stay open no matter what! screw this 1984 big brother crap! watch the movie 1984 ingsoc – these ideas have been around for a long time.. they failed in the 80s… hopefully they will fail again.

    and medicine is both a science and an ART. anyone who has ever been sick will tell you that. AI will never be able to accomplish the art side of medicine.. that takes a human.

  18. I posted your article on Facebook and it was deleted because it violated their community standards. I think you must be on to something. I know you are. It is a wonderful piece full of leads to follow up on. Your findings need to be shouted from the rooftops.

  19. I applaud your work; stumbled onto it today by watching the your contribution on a YouTube video from Spiro. As much great info that you have shared, all on point I might add, it is the why that escapes you, I’d bet. The vaccines that we all will receive is the final step in a 2010 DARPA process that Ms Webb alluded to in the video. Fact: in late 2012, early 2013 mass clinical and operational trial began on programs that are referred to as Remote Neural Monitoring (Also synthetic telepathy) and Behavior Modification, the ability to remotely intercept human thought, then anticipate and/or manipulate human behavior. It is operational world-wide with thousands of victims shielded by another several thousand fake victims who spread disinformation as steer real victims away from any form of assistance. It was the real reason for the Patriot act because the program depends on access to all contacts with their program participants. I am one of the victims and I can prove my status in the program unequivocally. If you want to understand what doesn’t add up, then please send me a DM on my twitter account, @Ken_W_Peartree. While there, please take time to view some of my informational tweets; there is plenty to see, if it is not blocked. I have no way of knowing for sure as I live in complete isolation while surrounded by people. NOTHING that the American people believe as we scurry about in their “Boiled Frog Syndrome” is as it seem, and on that fact, I consider myself an expert. Look forward to hearing from you. All the best and keep spread the TRUTH.

  20. Anyone who refuses to pay with cash will deserve the arrival of the inability to do so. It will be fun to watch them squirm when their plastc cards and smartphones stop working. Very soon, the only trustworthy payment option will be gold and silver legal tender coins, and those without them will become their biggest fans.

  21. Stunning journalism and sensational revelations from one of todays’ finest researchers. Seldom disappointing and routinely ground-breaking, Whitney Webb is my idea of exemplary reporting. Incidentally, my undergraduate years included time at Ernie Pyle School of Journalism (Indiana University) where Webb would have been lionized. But in todays’ cancel-culture such truth-telling is relegated to fringe outlets and cult-followings. This writer is profoundly grateful for her insights and promises to share with one and all.
    Best wishes and Godspeed to her and hers.

  22. Proverb In the Country of the Blind the OneEyed Man is King
    Truth In the Country of the Blind .. pretend to the Normal Blindness or be Lynched.. Be careful of expressing any insights!
    Bless You Doing GreatWork

  23. Outstanding. Forgive my question if it’s been answered (still reading):
    Suppose home shopping and a robotic labor force come to fruition, how would the bulk of humanity then earn enough to sustain themselves and an economy of consumerism? Sounds (at first blush) like this plan’s “bottom line” is in the middle of the page. Many thanks.

  24. I have always been suspicious of a Robinhood moment or a better word is redistribution of the worlds wealth equally among the nations of the world. However, to pull this off one needs to control in ones hand all of the worlds wealth and if what you describe isn’t it ultimately! Who will or could pull off something so monumental? There is a sentence in a very, very old book that goes something like this ‘a goat with a small horn boasting great things.’

    Are we then on the cusp of the 666 where no one will be able to buy and sell unless he had the mark or number of his name?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.