FDA Accidentally Exposes EUA Deception, Ukraine The Runaway Train & Massive Vaccine Risk Cover Up

5 Replies to “FDA Accidentally Exposes EUA Deception, Ukraine The Runaway Train & Massive Vaccine Risk Cover Up”

1. My guess is people were cut from the DeSantis roundtable due to limit the length of it. My problem was that Battacharya and Kulldorf still suggest benefit of the shots for elderly, which seems to be well disproven by now.

   Reply

2. Haven’t seen Whitney Webb in quite some time. Would very much like to see the following people: Richard Fleming, Stephanie Seneff, Michael Palmer, Michael Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Sam Bailey, Cristian Terhes and Courtney Brown. Hoping to see you on Rogan and Brand before never.

   Reply

3. Regarding the conversation between Del Bigtree & Dr. Ryan Cole…….Dr. Ryan Cole said that he found no graphene oxide in the samples that he investigated. This finding backs up yours and Whitney’s supposition that you both felt that the evidence was not strong enough as presented in that Spanish study for graphene oxide in the Covid Shots. You can view the full discussion by following this link and you hear Dr. Ryan Cole say he found no graphene oxide…..https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-highwires-lab-investigation-of-covid-vaccines/

   Reply

4. I suspect the single dose stats at 2:51:00 are being misinterpreted and here’s why I say that: First of all, we know that a very high percentage of people who died from the shots died within 48hrs, with a second wave within a month. So, imagine all the stories you have heard of people getting one dose and getting a reaction and not getting the second one either, a) because they died before they COULD get the second one, or b) because their body reacted strongly so they decided NOT to get a second dose. Either way, you have someone who is SO susceptible to the contents that they couldn’t even get around to a second dose even though, supposedly, people noticed stronger reactions from the second dose. (Could it be only the healthy lived to tell their stories?) So I would argue that the mortality numbers are higher for one dose because those people DIED and so were unable to get the second dose, or spiralled downhill so dramatically that they were unwilling to get the second dose. Either way, it shows you just how bad some of the batches were and how certain people’s bodies reacted very strongly to the contents. I don’t think these stats actually prove anything the way they are interpreting them, that someone 2 doses is safer than one, therefore hinting that most people who died later died of Covid and they weren’t fully protected, when we know that narrative is by and large untrue.

   Reply

5. Re: the ‘Safe and Effective’ discussion around 1:48:00, I could be totally wrong about this, but my impression has been that the pharmaceutical companies did NOT say ‘safe and effective;’ instead getting the media and the government to say it *for* them. I thought that’s how they were getting around that regulation. Pfizer and Moderna etc WERE making efficacy claims of certain percentages however, which seems like that could be interpreted as claiming they were effective but technically saying something is ‘effective’ is a value judgement, versus just stating that it has a certain demonstrated efficacy. Picking nits I know, but if there’s a winning case here, I’m all for it.

   Reply