Modern Americans have become much more malleable than many would like to admit.
Despite those powerful founding documents that enshrine freedom, inalienable rights and the general welfare as driving moral principles of law, economics and politics, very few living Americans fully seem to have a living connection to that powerful tradition which saw eight presidents die defending it over the course of the young republic’s life.
As such, today’s modern generation of Americans have been induced to think of politics like a game of left vs right football.
This view has successfully blinded the majority of its victims from any understanding of the principled forces of history shaping our present crises. What’s more is that this tendency has also obscured the role of oligarchical hereditary power structures which the founding fathers understood to be a source of evil shaping the entire human experience.
Yet despite the fact that actual British-directed deep state structures that oversaw the murder of so many nationalist presidents over the last two centuries (which includes the recent coup in the USA itself in 2020), influential mouthpieces from George Soros on the “left” to Steve Bannon on the “right” appear to agree that the greatest threat to the values of the ‘liberal world order’ to be Xi Jinping and the Communist Party of China.
In this Canadian Patriot Press documentary, the essentials of the 2020 US regime change operation are introduced which will bring us into a deeper appreciation for George Soros, and Lord Mark Malloch Brown as agents of international oligarchism.
You will also be introduced to Soros’ origins as a Fabian Society-connected economic hitman whose career was launched by Edmund de Rothschild and you will discover the purpose of his Open Society Foundation created in 1979.
This will take you into the inner workings of The Trilateral Commission which took over the US government in the early 1970s, and you will become familiar with a “re-branding” of the CIA as this criminal agency embedded in the heart of America’s deep state morphed into a multi-headed hydra in the form of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) which launched a new age of regime change under the guise of “color revolutions” beginning in 1983.
You will also be introduced to Soros’ role in destroying the system of sovereign nation states throughout the 1980s-1990s and will find out how China, of all nations, successfully purged Soros’ agents including the leader of China’s Communist Party Zhao Ziyang and banned the financial terrorist for life… in 1989.
After learning that Tiananmen Square was actually more of a CIA/Soros Maidan color revolution, you will be better able to appreciate how China’s fight against Soros and other CIA front groups result in that nation’s capacity to lift billions out of poverty and establish a block of resistance with other civilizational forces unwilling to cull their population or cancel their traditional values.
Most importantly for Americans, you will discover how and why Donald Trump represented a threat to Soros’ agenda through his attempts to break the USA out of the “British-NATO special relationship” and into a US-Russia-China alliance against globalism from his earliest moments in office until the last days before the 2020 coup.
This film is narrated by Cynthia Chung, produced/edited by Jason Dahl, and written by Matthew Ehret.
Soros’ son says “Judaism has always came first to my father”.
Can we address this pattern in today’s reality. Stop disregarding a 3,000 year old religion and the possibility that they might have an agenda. What if they were all Muslim?
Ehret is a Globalist propagandist whose role is to bolster the illusion that the same tyrannical Global elitists now destroying the formerly sovereign nation states of the collective west are different from, indeed are mortal enemies of, the eastern elitists of “China” (and quite probably Russia). Ehret is supposed to convince us that the Chinese are part of a force opposing the western globalist aristocracy and its ongoing effort to form a unified global tyranny / one world government.
This is an obvious lie. Its the opposite of the truth. Our traitorous western elitists, beginning in the 70s, dismantled the US and relocated virtually all of its capital, plant, equipment, intellectual property, etc (much of it stolen by the same traitorous western elitists) to CHINA. Our western traitor class continues to exercise ownership and control of that massive wealth right there IN CHINA.
Our countries have been gutted, their governmental structures captured, and they are being bankrupted financially and culturally by these very same forces in league with the elitists in the east.
So NO Ehret. This is too obvious. And so it equally obvious what you are sir.
If you think that, you are both not actually listening to what he is saying, and are blinded by the two party illusion. All of these sides are being manipulated by the same factors. But because this also implicates those you likely support, we get this push back. The two party illusion will be the death of us.
Sir I am under zero illusions of any “two party” or any party remaining in power in what we understand as the formerly sovereign USA that is in any way representative of US citizens of ANY race or political ideology.
The “two party illusion” 2.0 has transcended national boundaries and the version being downloaded now is “Russia-China BRICS” versus the “allies” of the collective west. What a croc.
Talk to me when “China” starts arresting US and western business and intelligence assets and seizing their trillions in financial assets in China.
Until then, that’s no better than another version of “Trump and the Republicans will finally get us accountability!”
Neither of those fictions will EVER come to pass.
I know you agree that’s all complete garbage. Yet Ehret, like a Stew Peters or a Tucker Carlson pushing the stupid “Dems bad Trump repubs good” meme, is constantly coming around trying to sell China as the great opposition to the coming totalitarian global tyranny.
Nonsense sir!
If you think Matt is pushing “Dems bad Republicans good”, respectfully, you are not listing to him at all. All entities being manipulated in this way (so ALL of them) are a problem. That is the whole point here.
Mr Cristian
If I may add one more point for our collective ongoing observation and consideration.
Just as the “sanctions against Russia” were in fact aimed not at Russia but at the collective west, specifically and especially Europe, the coming “sanctions against China” will also be, in reality, aimed at the collective west, but in this case, specifically at the US.
These are tools designed to carry on with the engineered demolition of western society, right in tandem with the Covid fraud, financial and cultural bankruptcy driven by our own captured “governments,”, and the ever more rapid march toward totalitarian world government.
The new global tyrants see “China” as their future economic engine and financial hub, and the “Chinese model” of totalitarian fascism is planned for us all, once we have been weakened sufficiently. Pity the hundreds of millions of ordinary Chinese who will serve as the next crop of debt slaves until they too become expendable and can be eliminated just like we are now.
Sorry Ryan, but I have to agree with Benji. Well, except for the use of the words ‘new global tyrants’ in his final reply. The ‘young global leaders’ selected by Shlub to ‘penetrate ze cabinets’ may be ‘new’, but they’re following the directives from the playbook created by the old ‘global tyrants.’ Joking aside, I would disagree with the final sentence in Benji’s first comment, (3/3/23 at 11:03 pm) but I have to admit that I’m rather curious about your reply Ryan. Why attempt to make what Benji said in his first comment about the ‘two party illusion’ and not about the valid point he makes? Like I said, ‘curious.’
I was not making it about the two party illusion, I was pointing out that, in my opinion, that agenda (not suggesting he is buying it) is influencing his perspective on what Matt is trying to say. His point is rooted in the idea that Matt’s work is somehow pro-China or pro-Trump, and it’s quite the opposite, as they are all manipulated by the same things, which is the true point. I am trying to highlight that.
Ryan and TD
Thank you both for the feedback. We are certainly not at odds in any significant way.
My perspective is not rooted in the belief that Ehret argues from the US domestic two party illusion paradigm. Very straightforward. Ehret either believes or he pretends to believe that there is a separate, independent China whose ruling elitists stand at odds with the US (City of London-Wall Street-Israel Cabal). That is also what the likes of liars like Bannon and Billionaire globalists like Soros want us to believe. Garbage. Too obviously false to even debate really.
It is because of the obvious, almost seamless, connections between the elitists of “China” and the rest that I am forced to conclude that Ehret is lying. He is too smart not to see it.
Mr Reha you are correct. The elitists have their roots deep in human history, with many of the same family names (and some new ones) appearing on the “chessboard” for hundreds of years. Any reading of British imperial history reveals the black hands of the Rothschild, Werner, Beit, Rhodes, families on and on, involved in literally every war that has ever been engineered on the planet from Europe to Africa and the “New World” and all points in between. Many of those old names hidden behind “royal” titles like lord and duke etc.
To my mind (but the point is of no importance really) what makes them “new global tyrants” is the unprecedented concentration of wealth, rapidly evolving technology (financial, communications, surveillance, biological, etc), and their collective recognition that they themselves, globally, constitute a Global ruling class, having far more interests in common with one another than any of them do with the ordinary peoples of the world. Consequently they are doing what they most fear ordinary people may do: organizing and uniting themselves as a single unstoppable force for global tyranny.
In any case, thank you both.
Benji, You heard your info from others and decided it sounds closest to the truth. And its currently close to the truth. But the ball is not going to roll that way. When will people learn, the Bible never fails?
This is the 3rd article I have read by Mr. Ehret that makes controversial claims that fly in the face of abundant evidence to the contrary. Ryan, I didn’t even SEE anything about a two party situation in this and not sure why you think that your fans are concerned about such. The statement about Xi ‘establish{ing} a block of resistance with other civilizational forces [which? North Korea? Russia?} unwilling to cull their population or cancel their traditional values’ makes no sense whatsoever. How does locking people in their apartments for months show an unwillingness to ‘cull the population’? It looks more like Xi is training people to be more loyal to the CCP than to their own instincts. Is Ehret inferring that Xi didn’t order these extreme lockdowns? That he isn’t in control of his country? That Soros or the CIA are instead? Tianamen Square appears to me to have been an internal affair, not an external ‘takeover,’ and Mr. Ehret does not provide any evidence to the contrary. The Chinese Communist Party decided to crush stirrings of resistance, which is consisent with what communist parties do, in Russia, in China and some Eastern European nations have also felt the sting of the erasure of their cultural roots and prompt replacement with Communist Party ideals. This is the second article that I have read that directly targets the heart of Epoch Times content, not via truth and sourced evidence, but through unverified assertions and slander. The tone of his articles, again, remind me of the drivel in MSM from which I walked away over two years ago. He clearly has an agenda but isn’t willing to do the work that you do, Ryan, to back up his beliefs.
Ryan, I didn’t even SEE anything about a two party situation in this and not sure why you think that your fans are concerned about such. The statement about Xi ‘establish{ing} a block of resistance with other civilizational forces [which? North Korea? Russia?} unwilling to cull their population or cancel their traditional values’ makes no sense whatsoever. How does locking people in their apartments for months show an unwillingness to ‘cull the population’? It looks more like Xi is training people to be more loyal to the CCP than to their own instincts. Is Ehret inferring that Xi didn’t order these extreme lockdowns? That he isn’t in control of his country? That Soros or the CIA are instead? Tianamen Square appears to me to have been an internal affair, not an external ‘takeover,’ and Mr. Ehret does not provide any evidence to the contrary. The Chinese Communist Party decided to crush stirrings of resistance, which is consisent with what communist parties do, in Russia, in China and some Eastern European nations have also felt the sting of the erasure of their cultural roots and prompt replacement with Communist Party ideals. This is the second article that I have read that directly targets the heart of Epoch Times content, not via truth and sourced evidence, but through unverified assertions and slander. The tone of his articles, again, remind me of the drivel in MSM from which I walked away over two years ago. He clearly has an agenda but isn’t willing to do the work that you do, Ryan, to back up his beliefs.
This is the 3rd article I have read by Mr. Ehret that makes controversial claims that fly in the face of abundant evidence to the contrary.