Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Email | RSS
Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (6/15/22).
As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.
(https://www.rokfin.com/TLAVagabond)
(https://www.bitchute.com/channel/24yVcta8zEjY/)
Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)
Ryan’s Music:
Important TLAV Mask Coverage
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/great-mask-deception/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/do-masks-cause-bacterial-pneumonia/
Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:
www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bitcoin-donation
(3FSozj9gQ1UniHvEiRmkPnXzHSVMc68U9f)
The pfizer rep dodged the question about severity.
I qoute “there is no difference in THE NUMBER OF SYMPTOMS”
He never answered about severity of said symptoms
Ryan, perhaps you are ready aware of those article and maybe even discussed it. I am sharing it because I do not remember hearing about it despite it being published a couple months ago.
It is a study showing how the Pfizer vaccine can turn into DNA in liver cells. It basically can enter the nucleus and alter the genetic make-up of the liver cells through reverse transcriptese. Similar to what retroviruses (HIV is an example)do. This is evidence of gene editing. The paper is peer-reviewed.
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm?s=09
I wondered if a damaged liver could lead to blood clotting and/or myocarditis. And while I am still digging, it looks like a damaged liver can cause those things.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41575-018-0010-0
https://www.cancertherapyadvisor.com/home/decision-support-in-medicine/hematology/coagulopathy-in-liver-disease/
“They” are the people who censor and lie.
It seems to be a coordinated effort (because it seems that the lies and the censorship are fairly consistent in what they lie about, what they censor, from many different places: government (many different governments), the different corporate media channels, the public relations arms of non-media corporations, the different silicon valley platforms, etc.)
Unless it’s purely a coincidence that all those different groups are censoring and lying about the same things in the same ways, then it must be a coordinated effort.
Now, all those groups probably didn’t just get together and all freely, independently choose to join together in a coordinated effort; they’re too many different groups for that. What are the odds that they all independently voluntarily agreed to the same plan?
Therefore, there must be some smaller group of people behind the scenes coordinating, and either somehow dictating, or influencing with carrots and sticks.
Whoever that smaller group of people are that decide what will be censored and lied about by all those different groups, that’s who “they” is.
The use or misuse of the word “gender” has changed historically, but never before was there more than two genders IMO
“Gender
Gender Gen”der (j[e^]n”d[~e]r), n. [OF. genre, gendre (with
excrescent d.), F.genre, fr. L. genus, generis, birth,
descent, race, kind, gender, fr. the root of genere, gignere,
to beget, in pass., to be born, akin to E. kin. See Kin,
and cf. Generate, Genre, Gentle, Genus.]
[1913 Webster]
1. Kind; sort. [Obs.] “One gender of herbs.” –Shak.
[1913 Webster]
2. Sex, male or female.
[1913 Webster]
Note: The use of the term gender to refer to the sex of an
animal, especially a person, was once common, then fell
into disuse as the term became used primarily for the
distinction of grammatical declension forms in
inflected words. In the late 1900’s, the term again
became used to refer to the sex of people, as a
euphemism for the term sex, especially in discussions
of laws and policies on equal treatment of sexes.
Objections by prescriptivists that the term should be
used only in a grammatical context ignored the earlier
uses.
[PJC]
3. (Gram.) A classification of nouns, primarily according to
sex; and secondarily according to some fancied or imputed
quality associated with sex.
[1913 Webster]
Gender is a grammatical distinction and applies to
words only. Sex is natural distinction and applies
to living objects. –R. Morris.
[1913 Webster]
Note: Adjectives and pronouns are said to vary in gender when
the form is varied according to the gender of the words
to which they refer.
[1913 Webster]
— From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48″