Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Email | RSS
Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (10/8/22).
As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.
(https://www.rokfin.com/TLAVagabond)
(https://www.bitchute.com/channel/24yVcta8zEjY/)
Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)
Ryan’s Music:
Important TLAV Mask Coverage
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/great-mask-deception/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/do-masks-cause-bacterial-pneumonia/
Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:
www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bitcoin-donation
(3FSozj9gQ1UniHvEiRmkPnXzHSVMc68U9f)
GOOD SHOW RYAN! Just a comment: I would describe Vaccinated people as ‘owned’, anyway! If folks are still gettng jabbed after everything Joe Kennedy warned about, has sadly become reality, then they are, at the very least, willfully ignorant. I’ve always forgiven ignorance, it just means you don’t know a ‘thing’…Stupidity, on the other hand, should NEVER be forgiven, that means you realize you’re lacking knowledge & are refusing obvious information. Thnx for letting me decide after being given multiple reasons for a ‘thing’!
We need change yes but more than that we need justice. The solution is much much more simple than people care to recognise. I’m sure you know about Natural Law Ryan. Following moral principles like “Do No Harm” absolutely simplifies all the perceived complexity.
You know Ryan, my entire adult life I have noticed a particular type of person, usually male, will immediately dislike me on first impression. I have quite a bit in common with you so I never imagined you’d be that type. However you clearly watched my video & yet you refuse to acknowledge my call for help. Perhaps you took offence to my outburst about forever being told “it’s time to stand up”. I would like to believe you are a big enough man to recognise the peoples need regardless of who said it. I seek no credit or gratitude. All I want is justice. I understand that the only way to find justice is if independent media take on the responsibility that your forefathers outlined in your first amendment. The people can not organise themselves without a free press. You are the only free press we have so it’s you that I’m calling on. To reject the idea just because you don’t like something about me, this is to betray yourself. If you don’t have the solutions why not at least try the one I’ve layed out? You don’t have to agree with everything everyone else says. You only need to agree on the one brief message to call for factul data distribution throughout the armed forces. The moment anyone tries to promote anything that isn’t objective truth you can pull out. Try not to see problems that don’t yet exist as we have no other hope at this point. Sure a better idea might pop up but, can we all afford to wait? I say absolutely not. Remember while you’re consistently doing outstanding work on the fine detail of every government crime, they already took down BrandNewTube. I dread the day when all independent voices are wiped cleanly off the internet. We all see it coming if we don’t change course. I know you & your peers & colleagues will kick yourselves for not trying something while you still had the chance. I can only plead with you Ryan; don’t let that day come. If you help people organise peacfully & that day still comes, at least you will know you did everything you could. I know it’s not a perfect solution but we desperately need to change course & time is running out.
The Salk study that you frequently refer to DOES NOT support your argument that the MRNA injection is causing the human body to produce a dangerous pathogen (the spike protein). On the contrary. Please read it.
In the very opening passage introducing the study, Salk writers are differentiating between the spike protein from the virus itself versus “those safely encoded by the vaccines.” To wit:
“Now, a major new study shows that the virus spike proteins (which behave very differently than those safely encoded by vaccines) also play a key role in the disease itself.”
I wanted to verify whether what the Salk writers said in their introduction was accurate, so I went to the full study itself. Sure enough, near the end of the introduction, the study itself states that”…vaccination-generated antibody and/or exogenous antibody against S protein not only protects the host from SARS-CoV-2 infectivity but also inhibits S protein-imposed endothelial injury.” That statement is ambiguous if not outright disingenuous, as the authors seem to be saying something like this, “Don’t worry, the spike generated by the shot can’t hurt you because there is an antibody response which acts as a protection against the spike.”
Well that statement is very different from what the Salk writers say in their intro. How can the Salk writers know and why do they assert that the spike protein “is safely encoded by the vaccines?” I assume they rest on the study authors’ assertion that antibodies, also stimulated by the injection, provide protection against the spike protein damage to lung tissues.
This is another layer of deceipt. We already know the antibody response is weak, varies greatly, wanes rapidly, and DOES NOT extend protection to the respiratory system (the lungs included) since the antibodies circulate in the blood and DO NOT (according to McCullough and others) provide any protection in the nose, throat, or lungs. Period.
Lastly, the Salk writers claim that the study “shows conclusively that COVID-19 is a vascular disease!” How convenient! And all based on the unproven assumption that the spike “safely encoded by the vaccines” is harmeles and therefore could not possibly be causing the cardiovascular issues they claim result from “COVID-19!”
So, neither the Salk article nor the study itself are your “friends” as should have been seen coming a mile away from the Salk Institutes. All of this looks like a great cover story to advance the “safe and effective” montra while providing “evidence” to deny injuries caused by the injections.
I think you have more trustworthy sources and studies to hold up in support of your argument.
Please refer to my original work on the topic. Of course I have read it. The assumption that I have not is a little insulting. Read it numerous times, including on the show. Of course they site the stated rebuttal (funding) that the injection spike is different and safe. Again, in numerous previous shows, I have made this clear: That has been proven, with peer reviewed science, to be false, incorrect, a lie even. So the Salk part of the argument is important. Just like Warren saying the spike can shed, but not in enough amounts to do harm. But then, since that claim, the understanding has changed, as now we know it continues to produce the spike. This is the same point. Salk refers to the CDC claim, yet this has been proven to be a false claim, as the spike in the jab, even if different, is equally if not more damaging.