The Daily Wrap Up
Article of the week Conspiracy Constitutional Rights Daily Wrap Up Government Health Podcast Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Science Social Engineering Top News

Censorship Now “Defends Democracy,” Myocarditis Much Higher In Jabbed Kids & Masks Have Broken Them

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (4/22/22).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.


Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)

Gonzalo Lira Alive
Child Hospitalization
Money Game Video

Important TLAV Mask Coverage

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

15 Replies to “Censorship Now “Defends Democracy,” Myocarditis Much Higher In Jabbed Kids & Masks Have Broken Them

  1. Just remember, we do NOT have Constitutional rights.

    We are born with our rights. They are ours, bestowed upon us by our creator, not the Constitution.

    All the Constitution does is state these rights are recognized. The government can refuse to recognize rights, but it is not the source of them.

    Incredible work, Ryan, I dont know how you do it. Thank you for everything.

    1. Rights that can and are taken away in the blink of an eye. It’s not like ‘God’ is going to come down here and enforce them for you, right? So it’s really just a rhetorical point. Like saying ‘All men are created equal’. There is the world of philosophy and then there is reality. In the real world, might and power make ‘right’.

      1. Its not rhetorical at all, in fact its stated in the founding documents.

        Also, its important for you to understand your rights dont come from daddy government.

        If thats a rhetorical point to you, you’ve missed the ball.

      2. Also, you’ve misunderstood “all men are created equal”

        The full quote is “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”.

        There is a baseline of equality the authors establishing, not saying every man is 5 foot 6 and has two kids and the same job.

      3. Rights can not be removed, or they are not rights. Rights can only be violated and ignored, or defended and supported. They exist either way.

  2. I couldn’t access the website (something about data) so I used a search engine. Still couldn’t access the homepage so I clicked on ‘Top News’ under TLAV’s search result. Finally got on the website! Clicked on ‘Read more’ on the latest post and was back at square one. So I went back and clicked on ‘Comment (1)’ and here I am. Happy birthday and God bless you and all the real journalists out there. The turkey video made me laugh. It reminded of 2020 when everyone panic-bought toilet rolls (because the “news” said something) and then showed off their “wealth” in the form of toilet rolls on social media.. It was also the year the Metropolitan Police told the mindlessly obedient ones to mob the maskless because when the police arrive, they have their back. Currently, the media is using Alexander Boris de Phiffel Johnson (British Prime Minister) as a distraction from the Pandemic Treaty and probably other important matters which has always been the case since he was the Mayor of London who bought illegal weapons with taxpayer money for the Metropolitan Police to use on unarmed protesters. If any Canadians are here, please show your children and any Trudeau supporters how Trudeau was called out and shamed by Ministers of the European Parliament from different countries for what Trudeau did to Canadians exercising their rights. With the recent news about Parental Primacy, do everything you can. These criminals want their own version of Hitler’s Children. For Muslims, fasting is obligatory from puberty onwards. Naturally, younger family members try it out too (though only for as long as they can rather according to the rules) so it’s more than just the adults fasting in that video of Palestinians Muslims attending worship at the mosque. There are four months of the Islamic calender when Muslims are instructed to not engage in battle (if the situation allows). Ramadhaan is not one of them. However, anyone who is fasting isn’t even allowed to engage in an argument during those hours let alone a battle. I don’t live in a war zone. I haven’t witnessed generations of my family, friends and neighbours terrorised and murdered while majority of the world (journalists, leaders, soldiers and the general public) and or smeared us as being villains for wanting to live and protect their ancestral heritage. I can’t relate and thank God I can’t. They deserve respect for their strength and help for their continued struggle to not be erased from existence. Some people say “if” there is a God, He should intervene. He did when He gave us life, guidance, intellect and free will. The rest is up to us.

  3. I do not agree that it is fine for people to wear masks, just because it makes them feel safe. If they operate machinery or vehicles they need to be charged with reckless endangerment or operating while impaired. Probably “impaired” even without the diaper lol

    Wearing a mask is still illegal in most places, because it is a disguise criminals use to hide their identity.

    Wearing a mask where one has dependents, is risking their welfare, as this creates dumbed down unhealthy guardians.

    Finally, wearing this scientific fraud as a virtual signal, should be made fun of, because it is shamefully ignorant, and with many humans, ignorance is contagious. Pandemic of ignorance!

  4. The N95 face masks (also FFP2 in other countries) are not even advisable against asbestos, and they are trying to tell you that they can somehow magically block respiratory viruses. Translation: “Elephants slip through, but we’re pretty sure it catches fleas!”

  5. 2:28:00 in:

    Omicron…”gaining traction”… context, IMO:

    I will guess that “gaining traction” is a marketing term, and posting this piece of the continuing “pandemic” deception, is a notice to investors. Gaining traction would also mean, the scam is working better.

  6. I was watching a video this morning about training for cycling and the subject of the training was sidelined by an adverse reaction to the jab. An elevated heart rate that did not go away. Many viewers commented that they had similar reactions. No censorship issues since the primary topic of the video wasn’t about the vax.

  7. “None of the cases ‘is known to have been vaccinated'”. They want people to read that and think, “oh, so none of them were vaccinated”. But that’s not what that says. It says it is not known whether they were vaccinated or not.

    But what does “it is not known” mean? Who doesn’t know? I assume the patients themselves know whether they have been vaccinated or not. So “it is not known” does not mean “no one in the world knows”.

    So then who is it that doesn’t know? The doctors treating them? The author of the article? The people from whom the author got the information? The article doesn’t say. That seems suspicious to me.

    Obviously the author doesn’t know (or at least they say they don’t). But why wouldn’t the author know? Did they not ask anyone?

    It’s very easy to just write “it is not known”, because 1) it is ambiguous but sounds “factual” to people who aren’t skeptical, and 2) if the author did know, or if they chose not to know, no one would be able to prove that the author knew, or that they chose not to know

  8. I just want to share something, I don’t know if tlav has covered this, it is Walgreens’ covid 19 tracker. They’re probably gonna take the info down or change it soon, but for now, it says this:

    Positivity rate by vaccination status (4/16/22 – 4/22/22):

    Unvaccinated: 11.8%
    One dose: 17.6%
    Two doses: >5m ago 21.3%
    Two doses: 5m ago 25.2%
    Three doses: <=5m ago 18.6%

    Although, then they say this:

    "All results, including the positivity rates by vaccination status graph, are unadjusted. The team has observed that the positivity rates among unvaccinated individuals seen on the bar graph appear to be lower in comparison to vaccinated individuals. Furthermore, repeat testing among those who were previously positive in the last 90 days appear to confound the results. The team conducted additional analyses examining characteristics of the patient population by vaccination status and the impact of excluding recent COVID-19 cases (5.0% of total tests). Findings show that the unvaccinated group are typically younger and healthier, less symptomatic and less likely to report direct COVID-19 exposure or recent travel compared to vaccinated groups. Controlling for recent COVID-19 cases, results show that the unvaccinated group has a 17.1% higher positivity rate compared to the 3-dose group. Controlling for additional factors leads to a larger difference between groups."

    Well, there is a LOT there. There are so many parts of that that one could ask questions about, but let's just say this: if we take their word that their analysis is honest and accurate: they are literally STILL telling you that if you get THREE doses that only reduces your chances of contracting covid by 17.1%?!

    And they are STILL pushing for people to get the injection. Gigantic numbers of people around the world have lost their jobs and so many other things over this, and for what, at best, a 17.1% reduction?!

  9. Agree completely with the commenters above. Voluntary masking is not okay! They need to come off and anything us normal people can do – besides living mask free 100% of the time, no exceptions – to make that happen is perfectly fine. Making others feel uncomfortable, public shaming, ridicule…whatever it takes to get those ridiculous things off peoples’ faces needs to be done.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.