The Daily Wrap Up
Conspiracy Constitutional Rights Daily Wrap Up Domestic Policy Foreign Policy Government Health History Podcast Police State Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Social Engineering Top News World

Why SARS-CoV-2 Has NOT Been Isolated, Chromosome 8/PCR Testing & The H1N1 Illusion All Over Again

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (8/28/20).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.


Video Source Links:!/cpImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_780/cuba-guantanamo-10th-anniversary.jpg&imgrefurl=

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:


Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

7 Replies to “Why SARS-CoV-2 Has NOT Been Isolated, Chromosome 8/PCR Testing & The H1N1 Illusion All Over Again

  1. Wow! Censorship in real time.
    Ryan, your daily wrap up has just been removed by Youtube while you were streaming it live.

  2. Your current live show was dropped from YouTube in midbroadcast. I guess you know. Just letting you know what I experienced, so you can be informed.

    How can we watch from your website, or is that only available after the live stream? Thanks.

  3. That was weird, You tube pulled you mid show. You better hope Twitter doesn’t follow suit. I went direct to
    Pscp link on your Twitter after.

    Too bad, that was one of your better shows

    Primers are just used to hold the targeted sequences in the sample that are being amplified. There is a forward and reverse primer which holds both ends of the sequence being amified. Thats my understanding. The primers are not being amplified so wont cause a positive test. Thats my understanding. Not an expert

    Its well known pcr tests have false positives thats why they need validation against a gold standard to determine the false positive rate. In Taiwan they suggest specificity is 95%.
    for the cov-2 virus . So if prevalence is 1% over 80% of positives will be 80%. If 5% then 50% will be false positives. Thats simple math. So basically they only test symptomatic people with COVID symptoms. Its one of the big reasons universal testing for HIV was not done. Too many false positives. Only those with symptoms or high risk persons tested. That lowers the false positive rate since prevalence is higher in those groups.

    I can find no evidence Canada found covid 19 virus in frozen waste samples from 2013. Did you have a link?. China found a similar virus in frozen samples from a china copper mine in 2013. U of Calgary issued a paper saying covid 19 might have evolved from this 2013 virus whose sequence was released by the Bat Lady Shi Zhengli in January.

    Kochs postulate is outdated. Even Koch himself could not meet the requirements for cholera. Koch studied bacteria not viruses which were unknown. Viruses are much smaller and cant be filtered out or easily grown since viruses cant grow without host cells

    Many viruses do not cause illness in all infected individuals, a requirement of postulate #1. An example is poliovirus, which causes paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected. Postulates #2 and #3 cannot be fulfilled for viruses that do not replicate in cell culture, or for which a suitable animal model has not been identified.

    Once viruses were discovered
    Thomas Rivers in his Presidential Ad- dress before the Society of American Bacteriologists in 1936 stated ‘‘It is unfortunate that so many workers blindly followed the rules, because Koch himself quickly realized that in certain instances all the conditions could not be met. . . . Thus, in regard to certain diseases, particularly those caused by viruses, the blind adherence to Koch’s postulates may act as a hindrance instead of an aid.’’

    Lipkin, W. (2008). Microbe hunting in the 21st century Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (1), 6-7 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811420106

    “The criteria were modified by Rivers for viruses, chiefly through consideration of adaptive immunity as evidence of infection, and by Fredericks and Relman to reflect the introduction of culture-independent molecular methods. Although the original Koch’s postulates remain the most compelling proof of causation, there are instances wherein neither they nor the modified criteria adequately address the needs of microbe hunters. Some agents cannot be cultured. There may be no animal model with which to test the potential of a candidate agent to reproduce the original disease. Specificity in clinical presentation is the exception rather than the rule. Infections with different microbes may result in similar signs and symptoms. ….Manifestations of infection may also vary with genetic susceptibility, age, nutrition, and previous exposure to similar agents. Proving causation is particularly challenging in instances where microbes have effects that are remote in time or space, or require cofactors such as coinfection for expression. In many acute infectious diseases, the responsible agent is readily implicated because it replicates at high levels in the affected tissue at the time the disease is manifest, morphological changes consistent with infection are evident, the agent is readily identified with classical or molecular methods, and there is evidence of an adaptive immune response. However, implication of agents may be difficult when classical hallmarks of infection are absent or mechanisms of pathogenesis are indirect or subtle. In these instances investigators must resort to statistical assessments of the strength of the epidemiological association, based on the presence of the agent or its footprints (nucleic acid, antigen, and preferably, an immune response) in hosts that are ill, and the biological plausibility indicated by analogy to diseases with related organisms, for which linkage is persuasive. Formal, definitive proof of causation may not be obtained until a specific intervention such as a drug or a vaccine is shown to prevent disease

    Suggest you read this paper from
    1996, virus identification is more complicated than we think, but that complexity allows for manipulation in a profession that is overly specialized and so dependent on government/pharma funding

    Here are Koch’s postulates for the 21st century as suggested by Fredricks and Relman:

    1. A nucleic acid sequence belonging to a putative pathogen should be present in most cases of an infectious disease.

    2. Fewer copy numbers of pathogen-associated nucleic acid sequences should occur in hosts or tissues without disease.

    3. With resolution of disease, the copy number of pathogen-associated nucleic acid sequences should decrease or become undetectable. With clinical relapse, the opposite should occur.

    4. When sequence copy number correlates with severity of disease or pathology, the sequence-disease association is more likely to be a causal relationship.

    5. The nature of the microorganism inferred from the available sequence should be consistent with the known biological characteristics of that group of organisms.

    6. Tissue-sequence correlates should be sought at the cellular level: efforts should be made to demonstrate specific in situ hybridization of microbial sequence to areas of tissue pathology and to visible microorganisms or to areas where microorganisms are presumed to be located.

    7. These sequence-based forms of evidence for microbial causation should be reproducible.

    FWIW Panemrix was not used in us, but the one that was caused miscarriages. Funny how these clinical trials seem to exclude members like pregnant women , elderly, children and sick people who are recommended/forced to get the vaccine

    Perception is reality and crowd herd instincts are reflected with Emperors new clothes show . People don’t dare to speak out if they know for fear of being ostracized

    Wafting from toilets and asymptomatic
    spread from mask wearing airline passengers suggest masks don’t work and that spread is via aerosols, way too small for cloth masks and even N95 to offer protection

    1. You make some interesting observations and I too have been wondering if Koch’s postulates might not be the be all and end all of virus identification and parthenogenesis. It seems to me that there are some very big holes in the general understanding of what viruses are or what they represent. From watching Dr Mikovits talk I get the impression that we are being denied much of the knowledge and many of the insights that have been produced in those biological containment facilities. On this subject I think it is unwise for us to think we can get a proper understanding of the sweep of virus research (or implications/applications) from open source.
      The potential of biological transformation through infection is the new warfare model as far as I can make out as infection is really infiltration or transference or any number of other types of influencing agents that are now being talked about as if they are very different attacks upon the status quo. We are being changed as individuals and so are our social interactions. It’s something that has gone on for all of time but now I think our dark controllers have developed the most powerful tools to date for controlling and directing that process.
      Nature has been commandeered by science which has opened up a whole new battlefield for the dark controllers; our own bodies and minds turned into secret agents of influence and infiltration.
      Ideology proliferated through a viral technology.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.