The Daily Wrap Up
Conspiracy Daily Wrap Up Government Health Podcast Politics Propaganda Psychological Operations Ryan Cristian Science Social Engineering Top News

NIH Caught Quietly Altering Gain-Of-Function Defintion, The January 6th ‘Fed’ & Bi-Yearly “Boosters”

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours (10/22/21).

As always, take the information discussed in the video below and research it for yourself, and come to your own conclusions. Anyone telling you what the truth is, or claiming they have the answer, is likely leading you astray, for one reason or another. Stay Vigilant.



Video Source Links (In Chronological Order)

Injection Mandates/Boosters 

Important TLAV Mask Coverage

Recent Mask Studies

5 NIH/National Library of Medicine studies from 2004-2020 all finding verifiable health effects from wearing a face mask, including scientifically verified reduction in blood oxygen level:

Cloth Mask Study

Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:

Ryan Cristián
"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see." - John Lennon Driven by a desire for accuracy, chef and independent news stalwart Ryan Cristián has a passion for the Truth. As a recent recipient of the Serena Shim Award For Uncompromising Integrity In Journalism, he understands that Americans want their news to be transparent, devoid of the opulence frothed out by today's corporate media. A cultured and insightful man with a worldly sense, Ryan's unjaded approach offers common sense to the individual racked by the ambiguous news cycle - a vicious and manipulative merry-go-round that keeps trenchant minds at a manageable distance from the truth. Avid writer & editor by day, Truth seeker by night, Ryan's reality defines what it means to be current.

15 Replies to “NIH Caught Quietly Altering Gain-Of-Function Defintion, The January 6th ‘Fed’ & Bi-Yearly “Boosters”

    1. If someone shot that robot dog, I think they’d probably get a life sentence for the new normal, heinous offence of criminal damage, just as a deterrent to others.

  1. I don’t know if I’ll ever be able to feel respect toward anyone who thinks they’re fighting for our freedom by occupying foreign nations & pilfering their sovereign resources. Yes they’ve been sold a lie but they make a choice to buy that lie. They choose to believe a lie so they can lie to themselves even further with the idea that “following orders” diminishes their own personal responsibility for abhorrent behaviour. They choose to believe a lie regardless of the innocent people they will kill. Ultimately their ignorance is the linchpin of the most evil empire on Earth. Without the ignorance of the empires hired guns, the empire itself would have no power. Therefore it’s not the 80+ year old oligarchs that enslave us. It’s the police & soldiers who choose to believe the most backward & perverse lie ever told. How can they believe they fight for us when everything they do; all day every day; brings hatred; suffering; harm & loss upon their own countrymen? If everyone pays them respect in spite of such wilful ignorance how will we ever disarm the death cult who rule over us? I just think it’s time to expect more from our fellow man. We’re paying too high a price for not thinking such things through.

  2. Ryan, please be careful when discussing morbidity/death numbers in the PH England/Scotland data etc… Fully agree there’s waaay too much COVID death etc after the vaccines (showing they’re not working and actually enhancing it) and that the absolute number of deaths can be more than the unvaccinated in the tables, however, a lot of people will look at the deaths as a percentage of number of cases (eg why you still see in the Scotland tables the higher age standardized mortality for unvaccinated people than vaccinated..).. : Now as you’ve correctly identified in your many brilliant videos/research, this is because case numbers in the different age bands/time categories/vaxxed Vs unvaxxed categories are likely under/overstated and inconsistently defined/measured/manipulated/cherry picked, and similarly COVID hospitalisations/deaths having been inconsistently defined (any type of death within 28 days of positive PCR for an unvaxxed compared to labelling a death anything but COVID for an actual COVID death if it’s a double vaxxed person etc etc)…… But a lot of people will just see the deaths divided by case number ratio higher (for eg unvaxxed over 50s) and think “ah well the vax is still better” without thinking of any of the above points or that it’s a univariate tunnel vision analysis that doesn’t look at the wider deaths/suffering [ and obviously all of this puts aside the utter carnage that the vaccines have been causing and will themselves, vaccine resistant mutations that wouldn’t have otherwise happened etc] …
    …so in summary maybe worth in future not only highlighting the ridiculous high numbers of vaxxed COVID death/suffering but also some of the reasons why the tables still sometimes can MISLEADINGLY imply “effective vaccines” in respect of mortality rate reduction (that you’ve correctly identified in your many brilliant videos). Thanks for your continued superb work.

    1. I was only informing you so that you were aware of the situation in case you wanted to remove the link. Nothing more. I understand that there are other studies and see that the thought police retracted it. I think we, and by that, I mean myself included, are letting this get to us and are getting a little defensive, which I am sure is what they want.

      So bud, take a deep breath. I am out here too, on the ground, talking with those on “the fence”, trying to educate them, and I know how this can get to you. A case in point, I just talked with a local hairstylist while getting my haircut, and she didn’t seem to think there was anything wrong with the so-called vaccine. So I asked if she knew anyone who had died from COVID. She said no. I asked her if she knew anyone who had become sick or injured after getting the vaccine. She paused and said, “Yes, five… no six people” in her immediate circle. She went on to say her twenty-year-old son had a mild heart attack three days after getting the jab! She said Paramedics attended, and it was weird that the first thing asked was if it was his heart. I spent the next hour informing her about what was happening, and she agreed to let me send her more information… which will include a link to your site.

      Hang in there.

      1. My apologies for the snide response. I mistook your comment for one of the trolls. I should have recognized your name. Just a moment of frustration. Thank you for responding.

  3. With resprct to
    NIH Caught Quietly Altering Gain-Of-Function Defintion, The January 6th ‘Fed’ & Bi-Yearly “Boosters”

    PHE have moved data comparing vaccinated vs vaccinated from Technical briefings to COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report.
    Latest is
    Observe tables 2, 3, 4(a) and 4(b).

  4. I actually received a call from the Canadian government this morning, telling me I am in a database because I am unvaccinated. They wanted to know when I would be going for the injection. Canada has an over 80% double vaccination rate, but that’s still not good enough. When have you ever known the government to call people on a Saturday? I asked how they got my information, as I don’t have a doctor. I’m glad I taped the call because it was bizarre.

  5. A Computer O/S much more secure reliable faster & better then Windows (ANY version) or Apple O/S ANY version & will NOT freeze Linux O/S I recommend Linux Lite Ryan try it on another computer you will like it
    any browser should have DuckDuckGo search engine used instead of Google use Privacy badger add on too

  6. Regarding the C19-related deaths in Scotland, the report states that the number of deaths is lower if you have been vaccinated if you compare the “Age-standardised mortality rates”.
    Is this a valid point? I don’t quite understand this concept.

  7. Ryan

    Probably mirroring other comments here but:

    Reagrding the death and hospitalisation numbers, you havent considered the size of the vaxxed vs unvaxxed populations:

    Roughly 45 million have had a vaccine in UK (our world data via google) = 67.7%
    Leaving 22 million unvaccinated (all age groups)

    So the unvaxxed hospitalisation and death figures for UK need to be near doubled to make them comparable.

    On top of this the division of the figures by each country – England Wales Scotland etc, then by age group compared with the vaccine rollout and tthen further by the criteria by which a breakthrough cases is acknowledged – all muddy the water massively.

    Your point is still proved though. As when even doubled to take account of the different (vaxxed/unvaxxed) sample sizes – the unvaxxed are at much less risk. But this is on the whole as a population (all age groups) and by comparing individual countries’ data to the vaccine numbers of the UK as a trend.

    Interesting that at the bottom of the Scottish deaths they listed that a covid death was a death that had tested positive “at any point”.

    Good work though as usual – sure you’ll have a relook and recover on your next show.

  8. In adition to previous comment:

    If we take scotland 11/9 – 17/9 as an example.

    We dont have an accurate breakdown for percentage vaccinated / unvaxxed for each age group – so we’ll add them up and compare that with the 1:2 trend of unvaxxed vs vaxxed for the whole UK.

    Unvaxxed of all age groups = 47+161+45 = 253
    Vaxxed of all age groups = 414+164+10+13+18+12 = 631

    Double the unvaxxed to roughly match the sample sizes (amount of population these admissions are coming from) = 506

    So overall hospital admissions roughly equates to 631 vaxxed vs 506 unvaxxed.

    Circa 24% greater admission rate when vaxxed – for a vaccine claiming to be safe and effective.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.