85% Of Masks May Contain Toxic Chemicals, Gov To Add Info During Live Streams & NYC COVID Detention

20 Replies to “85% Of Masks May Contain Toxic Chemicals, Gov To Add Info During Live Streams & NYC COVID Detention”

1. SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028. The Johns Hopkins 2017 playbook unfolding in real time right before our eyes. And though many see this narrative falling apart, most are still captured as badly or worse with the horror-tale. Sadly, I see this ending violently.

   https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html

   Reply

   1. https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/spars-pandemic-2025-echo-chambers-vaccine-opposition/

      Reply

      1. Ryan,

         Thank you — I don’t catch all your shows but I will watch this one after-the-fact. And I do know, and I am thankful, that you and your team are routinely far ahead of the curve.

         It was a year ago you and Whitney were drawing the links between Fauci and the gain-of-function research out of Ft Detrick, MD, and the possibility the Fauci-virus originated in NE USA, just as a viable possibility. It’s take a year for the remainder of the alternative media to catch up.

         Your work and dedication is amazing to watch. And my life is better for it. Thank you.

2. Why does Pete always have to be the boot end of the ga… Butt end of the joke i mean…?

   Reply

3. Where is the MP3 download option? Thanks.

   Reply

   1. Apologies for the delay. Up now.

      Reply

4. The disparity between the narrative and whats happening is so glaring, so permanent, that it makes reality a struggle for those who see it.

   At this point, its hard to figure out what will shed light for those who are distorted by fear.

   It is very simple, and as John Rappaport states, the easy weak link in the narrative.

   These PCR tests. No one can make a good case for their capacity to accurately test. We know this. Its in the open.

   Its a pandemic. PCR test gets EUA. Its not an approved test, just like the “vaccines”. The test cycles are ramped up and then you get your case count. The case count reinforces the pandemic and gives cause for EUA for the “vaccines”. This whole process relies on those tests This is fraud on a society destroying level. How can people not see this?

   And then on top of that the precedence set by the Dartmouth pertussis pandemic. Its been done before.

   People still line up for that shot though. Most in the generation above me in my family have gotten it. Despite months and months of presenting them with these clear cut facts.

   If this whole thing is a lie, and I’ve shown it, why would anyone take the punchline? I know people who are very dubious of what’s going on, but still getting the shot. If you’re dubious of the situation, why would you take the end chapter of a phony narrative?

   I’m exhausted. Being in this state of suspended shock for this long is wearing me out. I feel like I’m on the Titanic and its going down and I’m yelling we have to get off of this boat, and no one is listening. I feel locked in a bad dream at this point.

   Theres another kid, maybe 4 years old, in the shopping cart at the grocery store, with a mask that looks like the cat slept on it.

   Remember how clamped down discussion was when W invaded Iraq? It took years for open criticism. It didn’t really happen until Stephen Colbert’s press club speech in 2006.

   Jim Breuer recently on Rogan, the clips out there, called this thing a giant voodoo trick. Thats the best analogy I’ve heard so far. The high priests and their bugga wugga babble scaring cognitive thought into a hole.

   I’d never heard of this guy before. But he has the right idea. Call it out. Call it out for what it is: a massive voodoo trick by the global medical authorities.

   Its going to take more and more of this. Fortunately, the vaccine passport is stirring up some hives. Clint from Liberty Lockdown issued the war cry on Friday. Dave Smith and Tom Woods are drawing firm lines. The LP party issued an official statement condemning them.

   I’m no fan of political parties, but this is the only place I’m hearing a real pushback from an established party. Its going to take teamwork, or we on this side of the truth are going to be atomized.

   “The time is now, and its just another time. The moon is full, and it doesn’t mean a thing. This song is an ancient one, its older than the rocks. Nothing new ever happens in the world today.”

   And by that I mean people have always had to fight for whats theirs. For those that only know the life of the post WWII American bubble, its over. Like those before you, who’s laurels we have all rested on, its time to do something.

   Reply

5. Read the UK detainment law, this is Schedule 21 of the Coronavirus Act.
   It’s almost word for word with the New York laws you were reading!

   https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/pdfs/ukpga_20200007_en.pdf

   Reply

   1. Thanks for sharing my friend!

      Reply

   2. Good grief, it starts off just making things up. The first thing it does is state that, in this act, “coronavirus” means SARS-Cov-2.

      From the get, its setting up obfuscation. Is it that hard to just use the term SARS-Cov-2? Is it that difficult to retain the same medical differential terms?

      Coronavirus is not SARS-Cov-2. SARS-Cov-2 is a coronavirus.

      In this act, “cocaine” is means “crack”.

      In this act, “speeding” means “recklessly speeding”.

      Is this normal?

      Reply

   3. Or is this a slippery slope to then just be able to say “coronavirus” in the future? Now being used to it, in the future, it doesn’t have to be SARS-Cov-2, it can just be any coronavirus.

      I dunno. Maybe this is common practice and I’m just ignorant, but seems unnecessary to me, so I wonder what the necessity is.

      Reply

6. I just finished the segment on the feds’ proposal to interupt streaming services. One additional thing you didn’t mention is how this fits into the plan for government control of the internet. Big Tech is calling for government control of the internet, because, as you can see in all the other government oversight agencies, those agencies are controlled by the corporate behemoths. Whether the CDC, the FDA, the EPA, it’s the same story – the revolving door between the governmental controls and the corporate giants. What ends up happening is that the biggest corporations write rules that leagalize what they are doing. Don Rumsfield getting the FDA to approve aspartame is an example.

   In addition, they write rules that create barriers to entry so that new upstarts can’t come in and get a footing. An example of that is USDA No 1 rules, that require that all products be the same size. As a consumer, I don’t care if all my peas are the same size. The sorting equipment to assure that consistency is expensive, cutting independent growers from the market. Same thing is going on with organic foods – requirements are so expensive that only the global corporations can meet them.
   This is what is going on with these new internet requirements. There is a bill in the Califrnia legislature, AB35 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB35) that would require all social media websites disclose whether or not they have a method of detecting “false” information.

   This is the nose of the camel
   As both these bills state, right now, it is not clear whether such te chnology is even possible, but these bills are designed to push through the technology.

   First is if you have a method.
   Next would be to disclose those methods.
   Then Big TEch would look at these methods (saving the costs of developing the methods themselves!) and deciding which ones they want to use. The choice, of course, would be the methods that small, independent and/or startups could not afford.
   Then any website that does not adhere to the new reuqirements is banned.

   This is the back-door, sneaking approach to internet control.

   BTW, there is a call for papers by mid April for a conference in June to compare, contrast, and learn from the Chinese method of internet control and the western, corporate control of the internet.
   file:///D:/MyDocs/Interests/Control%20of%20Internet/Government%20Controls/Call%20for%20Papers%20on%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Platform%20Governance%20in%20the%20U.S.%20and%20China%20-%20Internet%20Governance%20Project.htm

   Reply

   1. Crackling crickets! that sounds like it was written by a robot. NorCal here. Thank you for this information. Paragraphs came through.

      Reply

7. Not to be published:
   Is there a way to edit my comment?
   I see there are no paragraphs!

   Reply

8. Someone on twitter brought up vaccinated people donating blood. What would happen if an unvaccinated person got that blood. Something to think about.

   Reply

9. Oh, here is the info for the bullhorn guy that got attacked by the cyclist and a longer video.
   https://youtu.be/cGRY4EZIkWw

   Reply

10. Parasites that cause Morgellons disease inside masks, diapers and “cotton” swabs they stick in people’s noses and mouths at https://truth11.com/2021/03/28/nanowires-that-move-in-masks-visible-by-the-naked-eye/

    Reply

11. Those fibers are ALREADY inside all of us.
    Do the grape juice test & you will see them for yourself.
    Swish red grape juice or red wine in your mouth for 60 seconds
    then spit it out in a dish.

    Reply

12. Unfortunately.. (ironically, yet gravely unfortunate)ly, the bulk of israel, now can look towards gaza with a more passionate sense of empathy…😓

    Reply

13. Hi Ryan, thank you for your work – best reporting on current affairs I’ve found.

    I think the question of the AstraZeneca vaccine and blood clots needs to also be considered in the context of being a British product, the imperialist rivalry between the UK and Europe post-Brexit, and the fact that European leaders are under pressure from within for not securing supplies fast enough.

    Also, I’d be very cautious to apply the Yale study regarding vaccine adverse event reporting rate of 1% to COVID-19 vaccination, given the increased scrutiny of these vaccines. I think all we can say definitively at this stage is that they would be underreported but we need more information determine the rate.

    Reply