How Israel Uses The US #TwoPartyIllusion To Divide, Destabilize & Control Policy

11 Replies to “How Israel Uses The US #TwoPartyIllusion To Divide, Destabilize & Control Policy”

1. In the USA before 2020, elections were bought by donors: the biggest recipient of donations became president. How they dared to call that elections or a republic is a real wonder.

   Since 2020, the elections are officially and overtly rigged. And those who dared to protest are silenced, censored or jail without charge or trial.
   The USA have become a banana republic.

   Again, the real wonder is why so many idiots keep voting for republicans or democrats?

   The answer is simple, either elections are rigged or Americans, in their vast majority are a special kind of stupid.

   There is however an alternative. If Amercians were smarter, better informed and less easy to manipulate, they would vote for one of the other candidates: RFK Jr. or Jill Stein.

   Provided that the elections aren’t rigged this time.

   But, of course, nobody talk about these candidates, nobody even mention them, MSM or alt-media, which proves once again that most alt-media are in fact controlled opposition.

   Like in many other Wetsern countries, like the UK, where tyranny is the actual system, there is no political solution. The solution is revolution and Americans have:

   1/ A constitution that tells them it’s their right and duty to do so
   2/ Have weapons

   Reply

   1. We should NOT use violence. We can talk with people; we can audit the electoral process.

      Reply

2. Awesome work, TLAV. We absolutely love those long shows and it has tons of links which is great for sharing.

   Reply

3. I haven’t said this in the past (although I’ve thought it for many months), because I don’t want to criticize courageous efforts by people I hugely appreciate, who are calling out what Israel is doing to the Palestinians. You guys in tlav (and others, like Vanessa beely and others) have done a million times more about this than I’ve ever done. I know you guys will use whatever words you want and that’s fine and I still appreciate you. However, at some point, I wanted to say this.

   Apartheid is an Afrikaans word. Afrikaans is the language of the people of Dutch ancestry that settled in south Africa in the 1600s. Are the Afrikaans speakers the originators of the mentality of the Israeli state? Is apartheid the precursor of zionism? If not, then why use an Afrikaans word to describe the state of Israel? (Even if you find some connection or draw parallels between the two, is South African apartheid the cause in some way of what’s happening in Israel?)

   Perhaps it would be similar to use words from other languages, places, and times to describe the sate of Israel. For example, calling Israel a Jim Crow state. (I’m not saying you should.)

   I looked up “ethnic conflict” in wikipedia, to find examples to use to illustrate my point.

   I know little to nothing about the terms I will mention. I also don’t know that much about South Africa. However, it would probably be possible to draw parallels between the following things and the situation in Israel. I’m not trying to pass judgement on any of the peoples involved, as I know nothing about them:

   Why not call Israel a Tatmadaw state (a word from Myanmar, related to the conflict in that country)? Why not call Israel a Liyu state (a word from Somalia, related to the conflict there)? Why not call Israel a transnistrian state (a word that has something to do with a war between Moldova and Russia)? Why not call Israel a ba’atabil kichkelem Yúum state (from The Caste War of Yucatán, 1847-1901)? Why not call Israel a lashkar state (a word that has something to do with the conflict between India and Pakistan)? Why not call Israel a dayak or madurese state (words that have something to do with a conflict in Indonesia)?

   Maybe you find more connections or better parallels between south African apartheid and the situation in Israel, but for the most part, the peoples involved, the ideologies involved, have very little to do with each other.

   It seems to me that the use of the word apartheid to describe Israel is an effort to blame white people for something that is being done by jews.

   Reply

   1. To be clear, not an effort by you, but by whoever originally started the use of the word apartheid to describe Israel.

      Reply

   2. Perhaps it would be similar to call South Africa a zionist state.

      Reply

   3. Some Jews, a relative few, do not approve of what the “state” created by “political Zionists” has done or is doing now. Jesus would not approve either.

      Reply

      1. There are approximately zero Afrikaans speakers in Israeli society who have any influence in what Israel does.

4. A few thoughts about the Trump shooting and the preliminary report from Rep. Clay Higgins (addressed in your last show). His key findings are summed up here): https://clayhiggins.house.gov/2024/08/15/higgins-releases-preliminary-investigative-report/
   If anybody at the FBI (perversely) wanted to fuel “conspiracy theories” about a cover-up they would let themselves be perceived as “tampering with (or even destroying) crime-scene evidence” – and that is exactly what they did:
   ONE – The fact that the body of the alleged shooter was cremated after 10 days without knowledge or authorisation from the County Coroner is highly indicative of a “cover-up”. (Did the State authorities know?) As Higgins pointed out correctly, it is now impossible to verify if the (overdue) autopsy report is going to be authentic or possibly manipulated “to fit” the official narrative.
   The importance of a truthful autopsy (& forensic pathology) cannot be overstated as all genuine JFK researchers learned to understand: The FALSIFICATION of the autopsy (surgical manipulation of the head and neck wounds and a devious “hide & seek” charade with 2 caskets) played a decisive role in the cover-up because the real, medical evidence would have proven (within days) that the fatal shot DID NOT come from behind (so Oswald was definitely not responsible for the murder, which was also shown much later with the Zapruder film). Therefore the whole devious, official story would have fallen apart quickly. Here is an excellent documentary:
   https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/altered-history-exposing-deciet-and-deception-in-the-jfk-assassination-medical-evidence-part-1/

   TWO – The fact that “the FBI released the crime scene after just 3 days” raised eyebrows in the Butler LE community. Higgins interviewed first responders who expressed “surprise, dismay and / or suspicion” at that decision which appears even more sinister because (as Higgins notes) “they had to know that (this) would injure the immediate observations of any following investigation”. He also stresses (that) “The FBI also “cleaned up biological evidence from the crime, which is unheard of. Cops don’t do that, ever.”

   An independent, FORENSIC investigation of the roof-crime scene, of the alleged shooter’s body (including a DNA-test proving his identity), documentation of all things on it and their exact position is indispensable (especially the ejected casings and the rifle: Why was it lying so far away from the body (estimated at least 1.5 metres and on the left side. Was Crookes left-handed?)
   Was chain of custody secured (no tampering with the crime-scene, removing or adding objects, changing their position, etc.)?
   This question can be answered in the negative because the bodycam-video on the roof shows that someone was kneeling beside the alleged shooter’s body – to do what? Why is the body always blurred in the video? (The post mortem photo of the alleged shooter’s head does not look like Crookes but more like this other guy – Maxwell Yearick. (Can anybody verify or refute this story: https://www.caclubindia.com/assets/maxwell-yearick/ He definitely hated Trump unlike Crookes)

   Reply

5. Part 2
   When FBI director Wray testified before the House Committee (on July 24), the importance of these “forensics” was also addressed:
   Biggs: Did the recovered shells match the shooter’s rifle?
   Wray: My recollection is Yes. (5:43) Q: And you conducted an analysis that confirms that? W: Ah, well we worked with ATF, but yes, some of the work has been divided (evasive answer).
   Biggs: How many shells were recovered from the location of the counter-snipers? (He does not know…) 6:02
   And here comes the most important question (which stunned Wray)
   Biggs: Did the blood & tissue, brain pattern of the shooter match the stories (witness-testimony) you have heard so far?
   (In other words) is the forensic pathology consistent with the story of the snipers (where they hit him)?
   Wray: The autopsy is being handled by the state authorities (PA coroner), my understanding is there was nothing remarkable to see.
   (Publish the report!)
   Biggs: Is the physical evidence at the scene consistent with the testimony
   Wray: So far – yes (seems baffled) – we have an ongoing investigation…

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWpq1RmNd3Q FBI Director Wray testifies on July 24, 2024

   THREE – The fact that “U.S. Secret Service did not retrieve the RADIOS that had been set aside for them by Butler County tactical command. The radio comms were properly and perfectly arranged during the extensive pre-mission planning.”
   It appears that an effective communication system between the USSS, the PSP and the local police was not wanted (Colonel Paris testified that the PSP had one guy in the USSS command centre but that the Beaver / Butler County ESU was not included; they ran a separate Command centre and had different frequencies – hence the necessity of the radios; I have come to the conclusion that this command centre was exactly in the AGR building (!) where Crookes allegedly climbed on the roof (bodycam video: “He is right on top of us”).

   A NEW THEORY has emerged dealing with the question why the MSM showed the position of the shooter near the left end of the roof (seen from the Butler fairground stage) even though the body was found near the right end (where the parking lot was). This theory assumes that this was done because the actual bullet trajectory is consistent with a shooter’s position on the 2nd floor of the AGR building BEHIND the one where Crookes allegedly had climbed on the roof.
   https://rumble.com/v58zyoy–0731-butler-trump-assassination-inquiry-5-rounds-on.html (the theory is explained (with a presentation) beginning at 26:00)

   Reply

6. Part Three
   A few more points / questions:

   • Colonel Paris (PSP) testified that because of the heat several people needed medical attention. If it was so hot on July 13 how come that Crookes could lie on a hot (metal) roof, dressed in shorts? (BTW, He wore glasses. Where they found on the roof?)

   • Do windows open to the outside in the US? (Really?)

   • If Crookes could get on the roof WITHOUT a ladder (which is now proven) why couldn’t the cops?

   • NOBODY saw Crookes WITH A GUN that day (Wray testimony) and the FBI has no idea how or when he (allegedly) brought the rifle on the roof. The “ladder story” was bogus and the account of his movements that day is also very phony: His parents reported him missing – at what time? (This is crucial) How he got to Butler is also a rapidly changing narrative: First, he came with a bike, then with his own car, then he had a van with explosives. All these stories were fed to the media by anonymous “law enforcement officials” (!).

   • Most importantly – Crookes HAD NO DISCERNIBLE MOTIVE (as Director Wray confirmed), he was not politically active; the guy distributed food to elderly people in a rehab-centre (for God’s sake) and wanted to go to university in the fall (!)… it does not make sense…

   • A final (crazy?) thought … we know that Sirhan DID NOT KILL RFK (although he fired shots – see William Pepper’s work) – the autopsy report proved that the deadly shot came from behind RFK, not from where Sirhan was standing; we know that he acted in a post-hypnotic trance (he could not remember anything about RFK but said he was “in shooting-range” mode when he fired the weapon (he thought he was at a shooting range because a post-hypnotic “trigger” activated his hypnotically programmed behaviour: a woman in a “polka-dot” dress. Let us just assume (for the moment) that the guy on the roof was also “pre-programmed” to shoot after a certain signal and that this trigger was the woman on the horse with the big flag…(I know it sounds crazy but we live in a sinister (“mind-control”) techno-fascist world…)

   Reply