In an email between Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and her campaign chairman, John Podesta, the former first lady and secretary of state cites “ reflection of english assignment how do I order prednisone online without a prescsribtion https://www.hsolc.org/apothecary/viagra-madison/98/ click https://www.go-gba.org/3401-letter-essay-examples/ https://soils.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/index.php?apr=cold-war-thesis thesis examples literature review math algebra solver follow site how to write acknowledgement in research paper go here buy engineering research follow link levitra lebanon thesis on abortion pros and cons https://reprosource.com/hospital/buy-prednisone-online-without-a-script/72/ https://rainierfruit.com/buy-viagra-online-from-australia/ https://scfcs.scf.edu/review/thesis-checker/22/ https://bigsurlandtrust.org/care/lassix-water-pills/20/ samples of evaluation essays go to link the best custom essays introduction of an outline how to write pie chart essay ielts non generic viagra without a prescription source site imitrex over the counter substitute for prednisone http://snowdropfoundation.org/papers/popular-article-proofreading-service-for-phd/12/ https://www.go-gba.org/183-unc-college-essay/ phrases for essay writing ut homework services Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region” to accuse Qatar and Saudi Arabia of “providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [or ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”
Citing the need to “use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets,” the candidate told Podesta the current developments in the Middle East were “important to the U.S. for reasons that often differ from country to country.” In the same email, Clinton seemed to claim Turkey needed to be reassured of America’s willingness to “take serious actions,” an effort that “[could] be sustained to protect our national interests” in the region.
In another piece of correspondence from 2012, the Director of Foreign Policy at the Clinton Foundation, Amitabh Desai, claimed the Ambassador from Qatar would “like to see [Bill Clinton] ‘for five minutes’ in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for [his] birthday in 2011,” adding that the small but rich nation occupying the Qatar Peninsula would “welcome [the Clinton Foundation’s] suggestions for investments in Haiti — particularly on education and health.” Desai added that while Qatar had already “allocated most of their $20 million … [they were] happy to consider projects we suggest.”
Al Jazeera, a Qatar-based, state-funded news organization, recently ran a list of “revealing, juicy and quirky emails” leaked by WikiLeaks. In its list, the news organization went over the “pay-for-play” scheme involving the Clinton Foundation, going so far as to mention an email confirming the king of Morocco offered $12m “for the endowment” — as long as Clinton was willing to take part in a meeting.
Nevertheless, the state-funded broadcaster failed to bring up the Qatar connection. Unfortunately for the organization, WikiLeaks promptly noticed the omission.
On Twitter, the convenient lapse wasn’t forgiven. Promptly after WikiLeaks pointed out the omission, users began pressuring Al Jazeera to explain why the publication failed to link Qatar to ISIS and Clinton.
Al Jazeera’s list of juiciest WikiLeaks forgets to mention the revelation that Qatar funds both ISIS & Bill Clinton: https://t.co/aBIuF861kk
— Max Abrahms (@MaxAbrahms) October 25, 2016
— Eddie Mejia (@MeBeEddie) October 25, 2016
Despite the public outrage, few, if any, news organizations reported on Al Jazeera’s bias.
In a period of America’s history in which news organizations parrot what one of the most powerful political dynasties in the country keeps on repeating to exhaustion — accusing foreign governments of “rigging” the U.S. election without offering any proof to back their claims — it’s interesting to observe that the mainstream media failed to pick up on this story.
Is it that Qatar’s and Saudi Arabia’s involvement with ISIS — while backing their favorite candidate — is a difficult issue to report on? Or is the media’s refusal to cover this topic rooted in fear that thoroughly addressing it will help her lose the presidential election?
Only time will tell.