DHS Proposes Massive Expansion Of “Collection & Use Of Biometrics” & The New ‘COVID World’ Design

3 Replies to “DHS Proposes Massive Expansion Of “Collection & Use Of Biometrics” & The New ‘COVID World’ Design”

1. The Yan Report is basically calling out the Bat Lady Shi Zheng Li for covering up for the military with RaTG13. Details will be provided later she says.#######

   Shi Zhengli submitted the registration information of RaTG13 bat virus on January 27th, showing that the virus was isolated from the feces of Yunnan horseshoe bats (chrysanthemum bat) as early as July 24, 2013. It was collected three months before Shi Zhengli published the paper in October 2013, but did not mention this particular virus.#########

   Its impossible not to see the collaboration between US and China and Shi Zheng Lis involvement with engineering corona viruses. One only needs to look at Shi Zheng Li bio timeline##########

   2007 the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Shi Zhengli published a study in the Journal of Virology in which they combined a SARS-like virus from bats with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and created a chimera virus capable of infecting human cells#########

   2010, Shi Zhengli’s team published a paper to examine the sensitivity of different types of bat ACE2 to human SARS-CoV spike protein (S protein) using live SARS virus and HIV (AIDS) pseudovirus. In the experiment, they also changed several key amino acids of bat ACE2 to test its binding to the S protein and constructed the HIV pseudovirus HIV / BJ01-S with the SARS virus BJ01-S protein. ########

   2013- Nature magazine published a paper entitled “Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like Coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor“, from the research team including Ge Xingyi, Shi Zhengli, Dasak and other experts from Yunnan. The entire genome sequence of the new coronaviruses RsSHC014 and Rs3367 isolated from the chrysanthemum bat (horse hoof bat). Shi Zhengli provided the SHC014 Coronavirus S protein sequence and plasmid, which is her field of expertise.##########

   2014 Shi Zhengli received a $665,000 grant from NIH for a study titled The Ecology of Bat Coronaviruses and the Risk of Future Coronavirus Emergence (NIAID R01 AI1 10964) as well as $559,500 more from USAID for a study titled Emerging Pandemic Threats PREDICT_2China (Project No. AID-OAA-A-14-00102). ##########

   2015- November 9 – Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli published a study on their efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. ##########<

   In the experimental results, mice infected with this “synthetic” virus had severe lesions in their lungs, and there was no cure.##########

   Shi Zhengli provided sequences and plasmids and as coauthor likely had access to studies details########<

   Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in France, expressed this concern deeply, telling Nature: “If the (new) virus escapes, no one can Predict its path.”#########

   2015- Shi Zhengli went to working at the newly opened BSL-4 virology lab in Wuhan.########

   2018 Shi Zhengli authors a review article in Nature Reviews Microbiology
   181–192(2019) reporting on of 89 new “novel bat coronavirus” strains that use the same receptor as the coronavirus known as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS). That study was jointly funded by the Chinese government’s Ministry of Science and Technology, USAID and the U.S. National Institute of Health##########

   January 23, 2020, Shi Zhengli team published an article on bioRxiv preprinted version of the platform titled, “A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.” The paper was subsequently published in the journal Nature on February 3.##########

   The article stated that they found that the sequence of the novel Coronavirus was 96.2% identical to that of the Coronavirus numbered RaTG13 derived from Yunnan horseshoe bats.########

   Reply

2. 100 mile unconstitutional zone
   “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” –Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

   Reply

   1. Thank you. Exactly.

      Reply