Joining me today is Derrick Broze, here to discuss the recent release of the US government’s long suppressed NTP toxicology report outlining the very real risks of fluoride — a long awaited report that followers of TLAV are already very well aware of. We discuss the implications of this report and what we can expect next. We also discuss the recent RFK Jr. endorsement of Donald Trump and the near overwhelming rise in partisan obsession that is on full display as we lead up to the 2024 election.
Source Links:
- Derrick Broze Archives – The Last American Vagabond
- (1) Derrick Broze (@DBrozeLiveFree) / X
- Long-Delayed U.S. Government Report Finally Released, Concludes Fluoride Lowers IQ in Children
- Fluoride Trial Archives – Page 2 of 5 – The Last American Vagabond
- Dr. Philipe Grandjean Exposes The History Of Fluoride’s Harms
- New Tab
- (32) Stir Crazy on X: “@angreeBadger @Dreamweasel @Hookrack2019 @c_h_e_m You could actually read the study 🤦♂️ It reviewed studies done previously and found with moderate confidence an association between high levels of fluoride (2x recommended amount) and IQ. Buy love your screenshot of your search results 🤣” / X
- (31) CMOS on X: “@TheTechnicals Is big fluoride in the room right now?” / X
- Debunking the fluoride conspiracy | Springbrook Family Dentistry
- Water fluoridation controversy – Wikipedia
- New Tab
- RFK (Zionism) Endorses Trump (Zionism), The Two Party Implosion & Doctors Expose The Gaza Genocide
- (38) Derrick Broze on X: “@flagellan @TLAVagabond The adults in the room are mature enough to see the game at hand and not allow a childish need for someone to rule over them to guide them. you’re being played: https://t.co/CjQDbIJWPS” / X
- America’s Frontier Fund: The Venture Capital Firm with Ties to Peter Thiel and Eric Schmidt
- The Co-Opting of Bitcoin: BTC Nashville, Peter Thiel, Donald Trump, and Rumble
- What Role Will Google’s Eric Schmidt Play in Election 2024?
- New Tab
- (100) Debunking the False Political Hopium Paradigm with Indie Media Veterans | Rokfin
Bitcoin Donations Are Appreciated:
www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/bitcoin-donation
(3FSozj9gQ1UniHvEiRmkPnXzHSVMc68U9f)
Dammit! Paywall for the group discussion.
Guess I’ve gotta pay to play. Lol
Considering all of the effort the EPA regulators go to in order to ensure toxic chemicals are removed from the drinking water supply- lead, copper, VOCs, SOCs, alpha particles, PCBs, inorganic chemicals, etc., it seems completely irrational to allow or enforce the introduction of fluoride, a known neurotoxin and a cause of fluoridosis, into the public water supply to allegedly help prevent dental carries in children who apprently do not own a toothbrush. Read the warning on the tube of toothpaste in case a child swallows some of this fluoride laden product. That should tell us something (and what about adults?). If the justification for fluoridation is to improve dental health why stop there? Maybe add certain vitamins and minerals as well? Maybe a few antibiotics while they are at it?
I completely agree with Ryan and Derek.
I have been commenting for days on different sites that are supporting this Trump Kennedy alignment.
It’s driving me crazy!
Keep speaking out, guys! Please.
I am going to recommend that everyone watch this interview.
Thank you!
I dont take any of it personal and Ive been watching Ryan for years now and will continue to do so….but I know enuf about math to realize that not voting for Trump means they need less 3am ballots making it easier for someone who has to bus people in for her rallies to make it look like she has support from the people (thats by no means claiming hes supporting Harris). Its the math, nothing personal. And then to say Trump is still championing the vax. He is not. He would “championing” it at every rally if that were true. He seems to really believe that shit saved him. Is it dumb? Sure… but hes a human being, not some savior you guys rightly pointed out that some people make him out to be. Trump may not be able to beat the onslaught of lawsuits theyve been throwing at him for 8 years but would anyone have been able to? Convincing people not to vote is a vote for Harris, plain and simple. After the election you guys could say whatever you want but right now, its seems stupid to turn people away from Trump. Trump could at the very least give us more time. Harris gives us no chance at all. If Trump is one of them, that sucks real bad..but if theres even a slight chance he isnt, is it worth the risk? For what? To not have to stand in line at the polls? We KNOW Kamala is. If it turns out Trump isnt one of them and we turned him away, we are gonna kick ourselves in the ass. Get him in, then say whatever you want is my opinion. With all due respect.
With all due respect Jamie, I find your response very naive and it misrepresents just about every point I make. One, as I am sure you hear me say (but for some reason frame as the opposite here) I do not believe your vote translates to the outcome, which means, in my view, the points about 3am ballots is irrelevant. Two, Trump has openly and repeatedly stated that the injection is still “saving lives” and that you don’t get hurt if you take it (https://x.com/TLAVagabond/status/1829573441055518887), and he just recently stated that again. Pretending he does not say that does not change the reality and only shows a lack of due diligence. Three, no one is “convincing people not to vote”. I say very clearly two things every time, first, that I do not believe your vote translates, and second, that IF you are going to vote anyway, follow your heart and not some childishly blind lesser of two evils ploy, and especially vote in local elections where it can have the most affect. Four, no one is “turning people away from Trump”, that is just how you choose to read this. We are openly and equally critical of Harris, RFK, Jill stein, etc., because we see them as all the same. Lastly, the idea that “Trump could give us more time” is just a sad mix of naivety and borderline giving up. You do not KNOW what Kamala is, none of us KNOW anything other than what they project and what we have proven over the years. The projection is always false. What we have proven over the years, imo, is that they are all the same, with a slightly differing flavor. And “if it turns out Trump isn’t one of them”? So you are willing to take that chance? Isn’t that, by your above logic, the exact same as risking it on Kamala? In that case why would you not be voting for one of the many other candidates that the MSM won’t show you? Ah yes, the “lesser of evils” manipulation. I hope you don’t take my stern answer personally, as I would imagine you wanted an honest response. Lastly, I genuinely hope you are right, and he changes everything, but when he inevitably does not, again, I hope you will reconsider the validity of my words, as I see them.