Once again the internet is flush with a new batch of cannabis naysayers choosing to report a skewed version of a new study. The findings are interesting and have both good and bad results. As always, The Last American Vagabond is here to report the truth, whatever that may be; sprinkled with opinion and perspective, but the facts remain the facts. The information always included in full so each reader can form an educated opinion as opposed to regurgitating half-truths. That is the defining difference between a journalist and a sensationalist.
A recent study, which compared 48 users with 62 “control” subjects who never smoked, found that the 
The greatest increase in connectivity occurred as an individual first began to use cannabis. After six to eight years of continually use the increases in structural wiring declined, but users continued to display higher connectivity than non-users overall. This could be perceived as an example of how cannabis improves brain function rather than harming it. Anything in excess can harm the body. However, it is becoming an increasingly popular belief as studies like this one rise in practice, that marijuana use in any form and in moderation, doesn’t harm the body, but rather benefits the user.
The study examined the effects of extended cannabis use by considering brain images as a first step on drug’s long-term impact, said Dr. Sina Aslan, co-leader of the research from the University of Texas, Dallas where studies were carried with three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to check the brain.
To obtain such abnormalities on a detectable level (as participants demonstrated on average) one has to consume cannabis about three times per day, which is above average. The term ‘chronic user’ is applied to 
Even now, however, the authors of the study acknowledge that they cannot discern whether a pot smoker’s smaller orbital frontal cortex is the cause or the result of chronic marijuana use. A 2012 study found that subjects with a smaller orbital frontal cortex at age 12 were more likely to start using marijuana by age 16, suggesting that deficits in this crucial region may predispose one to substance-abuse behaviors.
This topic has always been one of passion and personal beliefs. As it becomes seen as more of a political pillar and matter of financial possibility, the public will see many more studies to come. Only time will reveal the reality of long-term effects as the stigma is removed and laws begin to change. Is the brain of a marijuana smoker smaller due to abuse of the substance? Or are certain people predisposed to be cannabis smokers due to a smaller orbital frontal cortex? One may never know. The real question that must be asked is: Should this be the debate of anyone other than the user themselves?





