The Unjustified, Dishonest & Dangerous FDA Approval Of Pfizer’s Injection – Clearing Up Confusion

22 Replies to “The Unjustified, Dishonest & Dangerous FDA Approval Of Pfizer’s Injection – Clearing Up Confusion”

1. Something to investigate. Not that you do not find enough.

   https://rumble.com/vlmd4g-pfizer-seeking-full-indemnification.html

   Reply

2. Update: This vaccine has been used throughout the EU.

   https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/comirnaty

   Reply

3. They originally scheduled an fda meeting for everyone involved on a national holiday? Seriously?

   I can just picture that.

   Whatta you guys doing for the holiday?
   I got an idea! Lets work!
   High up govt regulatory employees…

   Reply

4. “FDA Approved” means absolutely nothing. Never has, never will.
   And…
   tsixE toN seoD 91-divoC

   Reply

5. Modern foods and medications completely destroys human metabolism. Not everyone that looks obese can help the way they look, and in many cases it’s not fat, it’s fluid.

   Reply

6. I don’t understand why do you believed that you have more freedom in usa then any eu country (eg. romania). Your employers maybe. In eu never an employer will have the right to ask his employees to get vaccinated. Only the state can (not happened till now) force employers to let you go if you are not vaccinated. But in that way anyone who will take it to court will receive the wage lost till the sentence and the employer will be obligated to rehire them.
   25% vaccinated in romania and now, less that 9000 romanians are vaccinated daily (with the fist dose).
   https://vaccinare-covid.gov.ro/raportari/ – no english
   We, like you, have the same bs press, same bs government, but, probably like russians, we widely don’t believe theirs bs.

   Reply

   1. I never said that, and I very much don’t think that, as I say all the time. I think you are confusing my comment about what Americans PERCEIVE to be there reality. Not that is in fact the reality. Very different. Watch more of my content you will see my stance is very different.

      Reply

      1. You are right. I’m sorry.

7. Can I get a link for the document that says after 3 months you’re not considered fully vaccinated?

   Reply

   1. The links are always in the notes, with 24 hours after the show ends. Usually within a few, but with different time zones, people may be sleeping or Ryan needs to get some sleep.

      Reply

   2. This is what you’re looking for: https://web.archive.org/web/20210815030034/https://stlcorona.com/dr-pages-messages/public-health-orders/all-public-health-orders-archives/fourth-amended-quarantine-and-isolation-order/

      Also thought I’d attach these research papers as well. Cheers.
      https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.22.457114v1.full.pdf
      https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1.full.pdf
      https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/who-says-no-conclusive-data-yet-need-covid-19-booster-shot-2021-08-25/

      Ryan you should look into getting some Great Barrington doctors on the show, such as Dr.Kuldorf or Bhattacharya.

      Reply

   3. Someone posted it. But all the links are already posted in this article in chronological order with category titles.

      Reply

8. Thanks for doing an audio only upload. I’m often on very slow cellular data and can’t watch your long videos on the video platform, so this is very nice!

   Reply

9. How are they going to find people to use as control if they make us all get shot? And what’s the point of doing any further studies — other than money — when it will be too late w/ all of us forced to be shot?

   Reply

10. Some are saying that the “news” media has “misunderstood” the planned approval of a Pfizer snake oil, and in fact the covid-19 shot has not been approved.

    Reply

    1. Those people are very wrong. And verifiably so. Covered it all clearly in this show. https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/unjustified-dishonest-dangerous-fda-approval-pfizers-injection-clearing-up-confusion/

       Reply

       1. Ryan.
          my understanding is that there is a difference between the Comirnaty and the original Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine . and that only the latter Comirnaty was approved vs the original . it has clearly been made very vague but additional strong evidence for this point is that there were 2 separate trials done one for Comirnaty and one for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. this is referenced in the FDA press release
          “Specifically, in the FDA’s review for approval, the agency analyzed effectiveness data from approximately 20,000 vaccine and 20,000 placebo recipients ages 16 and older who did not have evidence of the COVID-19 virus infection within a week of receiving the second dose [THIS FOR ORIGINAL Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine]. The safety of Comirnaty was evaluated in approximately 22,000 people who received the vaccine and 22,000 people who received a placebo 16 years of age and older.”

          have you considered this point?

          https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine

       2. Yes, in fact I read all of that live in the show. And you are just getting confused by the way it’s written. It’s a legal distinction. They even make that clear in that info. Now could this be a different product altogether? Sure. But that is not what their info says and we have no indication of that. This is the exact same product, we’re told, simply with another label. The name Comirnaty was chosen in 2020 and can only be used on the label once approved. Which it now is for 16 and up. The 12-15 are still only EUA, but it’s the same product, yet labeled EUA instead of Comirnaty. All the product already labeled will continue to be used under EUA, new product for 16 and up will be labeled Comirnaty. It’s really quite simple but I think they wanted it to be confusing.

11. Everyone please read the actual 13 page approval letter https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download. That letter explicitly says Pfizer-Biotech and COMIRNATY are legally different and have some un-named differences. This is a game that the FDA is playing and you have to ask yourself why. Is it so they can technically ignore the 211,800 VAERS reports? The bottom line is the shot that is out there is still EAU and the licensed one is not available.

    Reply

12. Ryan, THANK YOU. After watching your full video and re-read the 13 page approval letter. Based on your comment about the difference between modRNA and mRNA it is now clear what the “certain differences” are listed in footnote 8 page 2. On that same page 2 second paragraph it stands out like a beacon now. Pfizer-BioNTech has modified RNA while COMIRNATY has messenger RNA. Forgive me if you already mentioned this in your latest episode, I have not had a chance to watch it yet

    Reply

    1. As far as I can tell, these are not two products. It’s the exact same injection. The only game here is about the EUA vs Approval. It’s all modRNA. in regard to Pfizer.

       Reply

       1. In the letter it does distinguish them showing ModRNA for the PfizerNBiotech and mRNA for the COMIRNATY, I just didn’t understand the distinction until you happened to mention it. Page2/actually paragraph 3. In that same paragraph they say both that they are the same, but introduce a distinction. I don’t know what the modification was to the RNA but this does tell us that they are not identical. I agree it is a shell game and completely shady. They want us desperately to get the shot and I don’t think COMIRNATY will ever be offered. It is astonishing how corrupt all of our “trusted” public protectors actually are.