The Great Partisan Reset, UN Says Nuseirat “Rescue” Illegal Massacre & The Ceasefire/Starvation Ploy

6 Replies to “The Great Partisan Reset, UN Says Nuseirat “Rescue” Illegal Massacre & The Ceasefire/Starvation Ploy”

1. Hi Ryan. Love what you do. Just wanted to let you know that AU10TIX is pronounced authentics (AU-10-TIX)

   Reply

   1. Thank you.

      Reply

2. Like you see the US two parties as the different faces of the same coin I see the rise of the “far-right” parties in Europe. There had resulted a rebellious population against their politics, so they created this parties and this “Trump patriot politicians” to chill the rebellious population down. It’s their creation.
   CIA never played bad cause they tried to do good! Stop and think what a community of capitalists with all the power in the world fear more then death in 1946. Communism by the masses! That is the only reason that US population lived like in Heaven in the 60’s.

   Reply

3. I guess you’ve seen the latest interview of Kim with Whitney. The best recent example of the power of manipulation is when the left showed disdain for our past rulers and monsters of humanity trying to down their statues, in US and Europe, the right defended them like their Gods.

   Reply

4. Hey Ryan,

   This was another great show and recap on current news. I wasn’t going to comment, but then thought that I need to give some brief reflection on two topics you have discussed.

   Musk is not a beacon of “Free Speech”. For example, people need to keep in mind that as soon as he criticized Israel, he got “the call” and had to race off to Israel and bend over to the Zionists, being chaperoned by that weasel-Shapiro. As you mentioned, the same bunch of nefarious stooges in Israel who are associated with the Twitter bots, are the ones he has hired (been forced to contract probably), to supposedly deal with the bots? I hope that everyone can see that Musk is not a hero. Personally, I stopped using Twitter years ago. After Musk took control of Twitter, I decided to try it again. I have only posted screenshots of texts from legitimate sources, and I add the mla-9 citation, or URL, in my posts if anyone questions the source. I also share videos of popular Rabbis who reveal how they MUST destroy Amalek, or destroy Edom, or that America must be “finished” for their Moshiach to return, build the 3rd temple, rule the world from Israel: All Jewish sources from respected Rabbis. I also repost videos, news screenshots, etc., about the Palestinian Holocaust, from people who have 10s of thousands of followers. So far, the only followers I get are fake Unit 8200 e-girl bots, which I BLOCK immediately. I have no reach. I checked three different “check X shadowban” sites: 1 out of the three reported that I am completely ghost-banned, which is confusing that the shadow-check sites can’t seem to agree. I don’t waste time on Twitter simply because I see that there is no point, as I will never have the “FREE SPEECH” to share my data with anyone. Because, IF no-one is being allowed to see what you post; is it really “free speech”? I don’t think so. It is, I think, similar to telling an inmate, “You can damn well say anything you want, you have “free speech”, but you will be doing it from solitary confinement where no one will hear you!” Therefore, what is the point….

   Regarding the ridiculous copyright cases against you. I am a photographer, by the way, so I have been around this topic for a long time. Now, these are just my opinions. Back in the film days of Photography, stock photography images fetched a premium price: I knew amazing photographers who submitted to Image Bank (no longer exists), and when a photo was sold, he could easily fetch USD1,000 to USD5,000 for a great image. Those times do not exist any more, except for top-tier photographers in advertising photography—maybe high-fashion and food photography hired images can still get a premium price, but I am not sure. When digital photography came along, and the Internet-of-things grew, the number of photographers and image availability also skyrocketed—the photography sector became saturated. I mention stock photography because the photos you have shown appear to be decent, but standard digital stock photography. These are the types (quality) that many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of photographers can create now. and upload to numerous micro-stock companies on the Internet. According to Gab AI, as of 18 June 2024, it’s estimated that around 500,000 digital images are submitted to micro-stock image libraries each day (possibly more). Gab AI states that as of 18 June 2024, the “average price paid for micro stock images is around $0.50 per image.” And Gab AI correctly states that “prices may vary depending on the rights granted, the size of the image, and the specific library or platform.” From what I know of the industry, Gab AI is most likely correct, as there are so, so many FREE stock images, or you can buy an image for USD1.00! For example, as of 18 June 2024, Gab AI states that Shutterstock, a very popular micro-stock image library, currently has 500 MILLION digital images in its library, submitted by 1.5 million photographers—that number varies as photographers cease to submit, and new ones joining the library. I submitted a scenario to Gab AI to calculate for me and here is the question and results: “Today, if one of the 1.5 million photographers at Shutterstock, who has 1,000 approved images within the total 500 million images in the stock library, what is the probability of a single image from that photographer being found by someone searching the image library?” Gab AI calculated the probability at 2/10 of 1%. Of course, having a single image found at one of these huge stock libraries would depend on the accuracy of the site’s search engine, the key search words used, the tags the photographer added to their images, etc. Once the image is found, chances are that it will not result in a sale considering that there is an over-saturation of similar images, and the buyer has a lot of choices based on best prices per image….or FREE image availability. I am only using one stock image library as an example. Gab AI estimates that as of 18 June 2024, “there are around 2 billion digital images in all micro stock image libraries combined….around 1 million digital images are added to all micro stock image libraries each day.” Just for kicks, I asked Gab AI, “If you stacked 2 billion photos of normal photo paper thickness (0.01 inches) on top of each other, how high would the stack be?” The answer is, approximately 5,787 miles tall!!! That’s a lot of choices!

   Let me add a third point here, to compare the ridiculous amount of damages being asked for in your cases, compared to the estimated earnings per photo assignment of one of the world’s greatest photographers….EVER—Richard Avedon (1923-2004). Richard Avedon was a renowned fashion photographer who worked for many major clients from the 1940s until near the end of his life (he shot an assigned from his hospital bed [after having a heart attack] with the help of his assistants). It is estimated that in the 1940s and 1950s, Avedon earned around $1,000 per photo assignment for Harper’s Bazaar, which increased to around $10,000 per assignment in the 1960s. In the 1970s and 1980s, his earnings further increased, with some projects earning him up to $50,000 per assignment ($ Amt. Based on Gab AI findings). Considering that the vast majority of digital stock images out there (2 billion plus), only a very small percentage of these ever are purchased for use, and now, the buyer has the advantage, often buying decent digital stock images for as little as $1.00 or even FREE! Thus, in my humble opinion, there is something very sketchy going on with your cases. Of course, as a photographer I support copyright laws for creative work. However, all photographers have been forced to live with ridiculously low-prices for our work, unless we are being paid for assignments from major clients who can afford more of a premium for imagery. Only a small percentage of photographers nowadays, earn the premium prices, I believe, maybe masters of the craft, like Joe McNally and others at that level skill, reputation, and respect, within the craft.

   Nowadays, with AI being able to create some really interesting and fairly realistic imagery and artwork, soon, photographers and artists may become obsolete—soon there may be “trials of obsolescence” (ref. The Twilight Zone – “The Obsolete Man”) to get rid of all of the people who have become obsolete – when AI takes over the Art & Photography Sector – that is going to be a very sad time. Just to show that this notion is NOT as far-fetched as one may think; in 2022, an AI-created artwork won 1st place in an art competition in the Colorado State Fair (August, 2022). The artwork was created with the AI tool called “MidJourney”. The work was titled “Theatre D’Opera Spatial,” which won the digital art category. However, the art that is submitted in a digital art category is still artwork that is supposed to be created by a human – not AI. (Source: Salamander, Rachel. “Artificial Intelligence Wins Art Competition, and Artists Are Pissed.” The Guardian, 31 Aug. 2022.)

   Reply

5. Addendum to first comment: To be fair, Chat GPT suggests a more conservative figure for total micro-stock images, and submissions per day. “Based on available data and estimates, the total number of digital images across all microstock image libraries is approximately 600 million. Additionally, these platforms collectively receive around 267,000 new digital image submissions each day.” Which is more accurate, Gab AI or Chat GPT, I don’t know. Either one is probably not absurd for a guesstimation.

   Reply