Masks Remain DESPITE The Science, Natural Immunity Elephant In The Room & Vaccine Narrative Meltdown

15 Replies to “Masks Remain DESPITE The Science, Natural Immunity Elephant In The Room & Vaccine Narrative Meltdown”

1. Appreciate the work you do Ryan, but why do you think the mask debate is still going? There is no evidence to show masks work, all you have to do is look at the researchers in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the equipment they are wearing. BTW I’m not saying the virus originated from Wuhan.
   But let me just put forth all the evidence to show face-masks don’t work:
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33670983/
   https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   WHO: “However, there is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can prevent them from infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”
   WHO on masks: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-bQve-xvNnXBpyASzTfSKW4SLzYHz1_p/view
   “…of laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection (Table 7). In the pooled analysis, there was a NON-significant relative risk reduction of 22% (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.51–1.20, I2 = 30%, p = 0.25) in the face mask group and 8% in the face mask group regardless of the addition of practice of hand hygiene (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75–1.12)
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/
   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306735/
   “Though the respirator masks are perceived to be the barriers for preventing aerosol depositions to the respiratory tract, the bitter reality is that masks increase the risk of more in-depth respiratory tract infections. As quoted by Perencevich et al. 2020, “The average healthy person shouldn’t be wearing masks as it creates a false sense of security and people tend to touch their face more often when compared to not wearing masks” [27]. The surgical masks are debated to trap the droplets containing the virus inside, increasing rather than reducing the risk of infection.”
   https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2?fbclid=IwAR1WI0_kJaGqvvm0VvRV1AEitGdgOJ0kAt52NB-Xv_AUY0Ce_C558kuzcbQ
   https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0843-2: “Our findings indicate that surgical masks can efficaciously reduce the emission of influenza virus particles into the environment in respiratory droplets, but NOT IN AEROSOLS”
   https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4485436/
   “The input level for duration of facemask wear had the second largest impact on Cfa. For our simulations, we estimated the most likely duration of patient interaction to be 20 minutes, which is supported by multiple literature sources.”

   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32232837/: “Pre-existing primary headache diagnosis was present in about a third [46/158 (29.1%)] of respondents. Those based at the emergency department had higher average daily duration of combined PPE exposure compared to those working in isolation wards ”
   This study was retracted, thought I would put link anyway: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/

   Now I’ll link studies done on lockdowns and isolation:
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28915435/: “Meta-analyses have identified a significant association between social isolation and loneliness with increased all-cause mortality and social isolation with cardiovascular disease.”

   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20668659/
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25594955/
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17615391/
   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32112714/
   https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272596/9789241565585-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y:
   Check section 2.3 which is on page 7.

   Flu shots increase risk of other respiratory infections: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/
   https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1424409919713943552: Look at this “right-wing conspiracy theorist” epidemiologist saying natural infection is better

   Reply

2. Appreciate the quick mp3 convert. Its not yet showing up in my feed, hope it does shortly. But I’m waiting for these shows, man, so I went to the YouTube to mp3 site @Dan suggested. This time, it didn’t work “Sorry, the url can not be downloaded” is the message i got.

   Happy to wait for your hard work. But just thought I should let you know this change in the last week. Theyre blocking this capability.

   Reply

3. Ryan,

   You might wish to know that this article has been retracted by the posting publication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987720333028
   Since it is one of your supporting links on masks, I thought you may want to remove it.

   Reply

   1. I already reported on that retraction by the editor, which has no baring on the data this provides. But thank you for the heads up.

      Reply

4. Take a look at this thread: https://twitter.com/Nycweatherrepor/status/1424578522916573185
   Also I saw Ryan’s tweet in response to Dr.Robert Malone, and if you look at the 6 month Pfizer study, the researchers gave everyone in the placebo group the vaccine. So I don’t think Pfizer is even attempting to see if there are long-term effects. Also correct me if I’m wrong but didn’t Vioxx have long-term effects that could show up 18 months after taking medication. Now they are trying to get everyone vaccinated which won’t happen, but if they get 90-95% of the U.S. vaccinated, then they won’t have a control group in the event long term effects show up. They can dismiss the remaining 5-10% of unvaccinated people as “fringe, conspiracy theorists.” They are trying to make sure there is no control group. Also thought it was interesting that Israel started administering the 3rd shot of the series and people are still getting Covid. This 3rd shot has the same likelihood of adverse effects as the 2nd shot.

   Reply

   1. Yes it was a Meningitis vaccine as the placebo, which I pointed out in 2020 was ridiculous. But on top of that they gave them the injection after that, so even the poor contrasting data was lost.

      Reply

5. Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, Cupid, Magic Spittle Masks, Coronavirus Vaccines, COVID … Putting it in the correct perspective … MYTHS!

   Reply

6. It is my opinion that masking children is a an effort to break the bonds and the communications between children and adults. ‘The old ways must die’ type of thing. What could be more effective?

   Reply

7. You made a reference today to a blog and or an Instagram account called Star Maid or Star Made. I cannot find her. Please post a link. Gracias!

   Reply

8. Eugenics 101. Keep debating the obvious. The Davos group will do as it pleases.

   Reply

9. And as for the flu vaccine, check the substrate used since I believe 2014, having tumorgeni particles. Also read the work by FDA Arif Khan. Why would anyone take a flu shot or have trust in any follow up work on. vaccines of any type today ?

   Reply

10. Yeah, your screen glitched out, is a possibility. Similar to a child dying from Covid-19.

    Reply

11. Also anybody know what is going on in Indonesia. Apparently children are dying, and their Covid numbers are at record highs. I believe around 15x higher than what they were at this time last year. Also if you look at the graphs, Covid deaths started spiking right after vaccination started. I don’t believe Indonesia uses ivermectin or any herbal remedies, but considering the way India levelled off for now after using ivermectin should serve as a model. Imagine what we could do if everyone had Vitamin C and D supplements.

    Reply

12. When are people going to understand that there is no “virus”, there never was. If people understood this they would easily see that masks can’t be protective, neither can injections or any other measure. You can’t build “natural immunity” against that which does not exist, the whole idea of “viruses” is lacking a scientific foundation and I would encourage people to actually research this topic to better understand the issues behind the claim of “viruses”.

    “As of August 6, 2021: 91 institutions and offices in 24 countries/jurisdictions have responded thus far, as well as study authors and none have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification.”

    Research summary and debunk regarding the existence of “SARS-CoV-2” and “COVID-19”
    https://steemit.com/health/@johnblaid/research-summary-and-debunk-regarding-the-existence-of-sars-cov-2-and-covid-19

    Reply

13. very interesting en blocked by FACEBOOK as MISINFORMATION and HARMFULL to others..
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1Aai-syJ1A
    or
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/zL8DX9fjajhD/

    Reply