FDA Quietly Reveals That COVID-19 Has Not Been Isolated & CDC Again Admits No Evidence Masks Work

19 Replies to “FDA Quietly Reveals That COVID-19 Has Not Been Isolated & CDC Again Admits No Evidence Masks Work”

1. The Department of Defense conducted a large (N>10,000) study (published in Vaccine Journal Elsevier June 2019, see attached document) whose conclusions included: Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus. Although the flu vaccine was shown to offer significant protection from most influenza viruses and non-influenza coinfections, the odds of contracting coronavirus and human metapneumovirus were significantly higher (OR = 1.36 and 1.51, respectively). I have the pdf of the actual journal report that I can send to you.

   Reply

   1. Not really understanding what you are getting at. What is a metapneumovirus?

      Reply

2. The big news to me is CDC new guidelines on not testing asymptomatic

   https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/france-imposes-new-covid-19-restrictions-marseilles-delhi-outbreak-intensifies-live

   The main reason for this is the high number of false positives especially when prevalence is low. Not that they say so.

   In Taiwan the health director said their test has 95% specificity. If the prevalence in population is only 1%, then if you tested everyone regardless of symptoms this would yield a 83% false positive rate. If you limit testing to those with symptoms then false positive rate goes down because the prevalence in a symptomatic population might be 20% (estimate) and false positive rate drops to 20%

   Special needs back to school . The elderly and “feeble minded” are targets the eugenicists want to eliminate. Don’t want to lock them down, instead keep them in a setting of maximum exposure, especially if you want to unleash a more lethal virus this fall. Another reason for that is to keep them getting their vaccination shots.

   Reply

   1. They are all false. It is like spinning the bottle. We all have viruses in us. It doesn’t mean we are sick, infected, or contagious. The tests only test for past coronaviruses, so it is ridiculous for any doctor to administer one to detect Sars 2 . They are being dishonest with you if they do. Testing is a complete hoax.

      Reply

3. I’m so tired of the back and forth reports of the virus isolation. Is it isolated or not? Because that report is from may and in june, this was released, https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
   Just for reference I do not agree with any mainstream science, or politics, I just want to be on my toes before I spread the word about the isolation when there is so many conflicting reports. Is this cdc study referring to an improper isolation or is it a true isolation? How can a layman know the difference?

   Reply

   1. I feel the same way. Was there ever a purified isolation, or is it just a false run to being the first, even though the sequencing was never finished?

      Reply

   2. …and in July the CDC published this :
      “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

      The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”
      Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.
      A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.
      Aother way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
      NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.
      THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

      Reply

4. Why would my comment disappear? I had a legitimate question as a truth seeker about virus isolation and instead of a reply it was not approved? I listen to every show…I’m just trying to get a grip on the whole situation..

   Reply

   1. What comment are you referring to? The only ones that get held are when the site considers them spam. And I don’t see any comments held. I do see another comment from you, is that the one you meant? You might have needed to just refresh the page. If there was another you don’t see, please email me and let me know [email protected].

      Reply

      1. My apologies, the other tab showed it waiting for approval but in the new tab it wasn’t there so I was confused, but it was on my end, again sorry. Do you have any knowledge of the link I posted about the Cdc study and what does it imply, have they or have they not isolated it? As you know Ryan, they are constantly conflicting themselves on purpose to confuse us. So how can I know if the claim they isolated it is outweighed by the FDA saying they haven’t, is there any light you can shed on this issue? Or a direction I can go to determine for myself? Thank you for all the work you do

      2. Absolutely, I will be going more in-depth on my next show.

5. If people allow themselves to have their DNA altered, with a patented fake vaccine, and given how corrupted the patent law has become regarding living things, will this make a legal case, for the vaccine companies, to now own you, since you will no longer be a natural born human?

   Reply

6. Re: CDC isolation of virus:

   Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are “currently available”, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA. (quotation marks added)

   “Currently” can be interpreted two ways: at this historic point in time (Ryan’s interpretation); or available and in stock.

   The CDC article Matthew refers to discusses isolation:

   Clinical specimens from a case-patient who had acquired COVID-19 during travel to China and who was identified in Washington, USA, were collected as described (1). Nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swab specimens were collected on day 3 postsymptom onset, placed in 2–3 mL of viral transport medium, used for molecular diagnosis, and frozen. Confirmed PCR-positive specimens were aliquoted and refrozen until virus isolation was initiated.

   Reading that, albeit with no medical background, this does not seem scientific in the least. Someone returns from China “with COVID-19” and shows some symptoms, and three days later the lab takes a swab.

   At this juncture, the virus has never been isolated but they “know” the person has COVID-19. How is that even possible?

   Then they take swabs and voila! they find DNA material and deem it to be SARS-coV-2 since… (i) that is what it must be, right? (ii) the lab then took that virus and went on to discover it revealed a novel illness with unique symptoms, right?

   The evidence of a purified isolation of SARS-coV-2 is weak, but shouldn’t it be beyond a reasonable doubt? Medical incompetence is the virus, and nothing more from where I stand.

   Reply

   1. Not only that sounding fishy, but Koch’s Postulates, the gold standard of scientific study, requires there to be many like cases to study the virus, not one. Are they deciding who has Sars 2, by using the current testing which actually tests for Sars 1 and other coronaviruses? Not very scientific at all. Where is Dr. Buttar on this? Or is everything a big secret on purpose?

      Reply

7. The issue still goes back to the beginning…If they now have the true sequence of the virus, then it should match up with what they have been using for the last many months, and if its not the same sequence then if they were honest, they would have to back up and say everything up to this point has all been based on guesswork and start over. Are we to think they will come out and say all the tests have been fraudulent and we’re so sorry for all the problems we’ve caused? No, but they are backing themselves even further into the corner if they admit at this late date they have isolated the virus. The gold standard test would definitively disprove the PCR tests.

   Reply

8. I don’t trust any government info. Would just like to know why masks seem to work in the rest of the world. I personally think the best way to protect yourself is to boost your immune system.

   Reply

   1. Masks don’t work except for what they were designed for, to keep surgeon spittle out of patient’s open body.

      Reply

   2. There are other reasons why low rates of “Covid” in other countries. Not because of masks. Could be honesty that we had high rates, and instead used other deaths to account for Covid. Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Big Media are very dishonest in the United States.

      Reply

9. I wonder if you might do a deep dive on monoclonal antibodies? I stumbled across a C-Span interview with a panel with Fauci, Rick Bright HHS Director of BARDA, et al titled “Universal Flu Vaccine” where 49:00 minutes into the video Bright claims they were working on infusing the ingredients of the COVID-19 shots into monoclonal antibodies. https://www.c-span.org/video/?465845-1/universal-flu-vaccine Very similar to doing the same to our food supply. Really makes you wonder what else they are poisoning our food supply and pharmaceuticals with.

   We know our municipal water supplies are being poisoned with Fluoride, i.e., produce crops being irrigated by municipal water sources will also poison our crops. But this would infuriate people like Joe Rogan, De Santis and others who have been recommending monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 therapy. If it turns out big pharma and our government are deceptively getting their toxic concoction into bodies of those who chose alternate immunization methods, this would be yet another crime against humanity.

   Thanks for all you do!

   Reply